Tag: study legal studies online

Categories
Blog

Competition Law Issues in the Fashion Industry

By: Cheshta Tater 

When one thinks of the fashion industry, the first words which come into one’s head are “designer wear” and “exclusivity”. A small consumer share but a considerable revenue and profit share of the fashion industry comprises luxury fashion.[1] Luxury fashion thrives on exclusivity and brand value and is always a status symbol, never a need. Given its exclusive and expensive nature, one cannot help but wonder how it rarely ever comes under the lens of the Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) or any other anti-trust regulatory body.

The objective of competition law is to create a healthy market environment by protecting and balancing the interests of businesses, consumers, and the economy. Lower but competitive prices allow consumers to make informed decisions about the substitutive products they wish to purchase while ensuring that no business abuses its dominant position. However, in the luxury sector of the fashion industry, the prices of products are always sky-rocketing. The much affordable products can not substitute them since the cost of a product, and its brand carries high social standing value, and are often one of a kind.

In the past few years, there have been several mergers and acquisitions in the luxury fashion sector worldwide, leading to a few dominant players. However, none of them has come under the beat for violating provisions of competition law. Through this article, the author would elaborate upon regulatory authorities’ findings regarding the monopolies present in the luxury sector. After that, the intersection of Intellectual Property Rights (“IPR”) and Competition Laws concerning the fashion industry. Lastly, the author would present their views on the necessity to check on the dominant players in the luxury and high fashion sectors.

Learn more about Fashion Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Legaleye Advocates and Legal Consultants!

  1. Escaping the Watchdogs

The 1990s saw the boom of luxury fashion houses as well as fast fashion houses across the globe. With India’s globalisation in 1991, these brands became household names for the affluent and aspirational products for the middle class. One such brand was “Louis Vuitton”, the first label of the world’s largest luxury fashion group, LVMH.[2]

Since 1987, LVMH has acquired many luxury labels, both within and outside the fashion sector. Today, the group owns 75 luxury houses[3] in the industry of, inter alia, clothing, cosmetics, bags, watches, wines and spirits, and perfumes. In 2000, the joint acquisition of the fashion house Prada by LVMH and Fendi was approved.[4] The European Commission allowed for such a merger since these companies’ market share did not exceed the 25% limit.[5] Even though the 25% mark was crossed in the luxury handbags sector and leather accessories, the Commission chose to look at the luxury sector as a whole rather than dividing it into segments such as luxury clothing, luxury handbags, and luxury wines, and the likes.[6] The Commission believed that despite the merger, the parties would not be a dominant player in the market,[7] and the same was reasoned by stating:

  • Luxury items have low to no substitutability with other similar but non-luxurious products[8]; and
  • The purchase of a luxury good is linked to prestige rather than consumption of a specific item,[9] indicating that one luxury label’s product can not be substituted by a similar effect of another luxury label.

The goodwill, brand name, and the trademark value of a luxury fashion group is the most significant factor in deciding the cost of its goods and its worth as a status symbol. The intersection of IPR and Competition law is discussed in the following segment. This will help understand the exorbitant prices and the Commission’s reasons behind allowing the joint acquisition.

Learn more about Fashion Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Legaleye Advocates and Legal Consultants!

  1. The intersection of IPR and Competition Law

IPR refers to a bundle of rights which give the owner the right to exclude others from accessing the product, subject to a limited period, i.e., it aims towards providing a sort of monopoly to the owner of the said invention by giving them the sole right to use or distribute it. On the other hand, Competition Law strives for the exact opposite and actively works towards a non-monopolistic market. Hence, a tussle arises between the two–which while talking of similar subjects, are complementary to one another in nature in certain areas and balancing them is essential for having a near-perfect market.

The denotation of ‘competition’ in the IPR and Competition Law are contextually different. The primary objectives of granting IPR encourage fierce competition among the intending innovators and simultaneously restrict the competition in many ways. At the end of the specified duration, the rights go to the public domain ending the completion. The objective of Competition Law is to prevent abusive practices in the market, promote and sustain competition in markets and ensure that the consumers get the right products at a reasonable price and better quality.[10]

While competition in IPR is reward-based, it aims to regulate and eliminate the unfair advantages wielded by monopoly holders in Competition Law. Competition Law also does not recognise the concept of right, while IPR on the other hand, by way of competition, allows for exploitation of rights, albeit in a restricted manner. However, in both, the basic concept of competition is the main driving force of respective legislation. While it may seem that the objectives of both are poles apart, somewhere down the line, their ultimate goals are the same, i.e., to achieve consumer welfare.

Learn more about Fashion Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Legaleye Advocates and Legal Consultants!

When it comes to luxury fashion, a dire need is seen to strike a balance between the two laws. While IPR is essential to luxury brands as more than anything, it is the brand’s uniqueness, which makes it a luxurious one. For example, it is the red sole of Christian Louboutin’s, which attribute them their high value. The principles of IPR must remain intact to promote innovation and cater to the public who may value uniqueness as an important factor while purchasing. For the same, evils such as Counterfeiting must be avoided and actively punished not to bring down the value of said luxury brands and in the background, the importance of innovation.

However, it is also crucial that these exclusive rights do not turn into Monopolies which in turn do not just turn exploitative to other producers, but are also unfair to the consumer as because of this exclusivity, not only can be charged exorbitant prices for said ‘unique products’, but also result in lesser variety for the consumer to choose from. And hence, the balance between Competition Law and IPR needs to be struck perfectly to neither take away from the Innovators and Owners, but also not hamper the consumer.

  • Bring them under the lens.

As discussed earlier, luxury brands are known for their exclusive goods and sometimes, even their exclusive customers. A luxury handbag label, Birkin, is so exclusive that bags aren’t available in retail stores and only a very few loyal customers are even offered to purchase a Birkin handbag.[11] This exclusivity of the brand and its reflection lies in the originality and sophistication of the product’s creation, the qualitative level of the materials used, and the products’ marketing.

Considering such exclusivity of the brand and its goods, presupposing luxury products’ interchangeability does not set a good precedent. For instance, no other label’s handbag is at par with a Birkin bag when it comes to exclusivity and status. As established earlier, luxury products are not purchased for their utility but their reputation. Even a product of the same fashion house cannot replace the more exclusive product at such a point. Taking the example of Birkin, a Birkin bag cannot be substituted by a bag of Hermès, which is the parent company of Birkin. Their cost indicates the same. While the cheapest Hermès bag sells for $540, the cheapest Birkin doesn’t trade for anything less than $12000.[12]

Learn more about Fashion Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Legaleye Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Suppose the interchangeability of luxury products cannot be presumed. In that case, the entire luxury market cannot be created as a single competitive space, i.e., a more transparent and distinct division of products is necessary to correctly evaluate competitiveness and dominance in the luxury market. Wines and bags cannot be created in the same market. Once distinct relevant market needs are defined, it will be apparent that LVMH is a dominant player in two sectors: luxury handbags and luxury leather accessories.[13] The pertinent question in competition law now arises: Is this dominant position being abused?

In LVMH’s case, it is crucial to understand that the group owns 75 brands, many of which are “must-have” goods for retailers, i.e., an essential product that retailers have to stock and display to meet their customer’s requirements.[14] This leads to lower bargaining power in the hands of the retailer so that they have to stock more from the house, apart from the most-have. In turn, this leads to the absence or reduced presence of other dwellings in such a boutique because the retailer only has so much capital to invest.

Companies are free to enter the market in a competitive market to compete with existing players, without immediately devoured by more powerful rivals. It is becoming difficult for existing players to compete with LVMH; one can only imagine how new players will be slaughtered in the market. LVMH’s turnover of 53.7 billion euros in 2019 marked its dominance as the strongest player in the luxury market. Gucci, the second-largest luxury fashion house, has still not reached the 10 billion euro turnover landmark.[15]

Learn more about Fashion Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Legaleye Advocates and Legal Consultants!

The numbers speak for themselves, indicating that the abuse of a dominant market position is not always active but is passive. If too much emphasis is placed on active abuse, there may be a risk that the market’s actual situation and concerns are overlooked.

[1] McKinsey and Company, The State of Fashion 2020 (2020) <https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/the%20state%20of%20fashion%202020%20navigating%20uncertainty/the-state-of-fashion-2020-final.ashx> 90-91

[2] Deloitte, Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2019: Bridging the Gap between the Old and the New (2019) <https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ar/Documents/Consumer_and_Industrial_Products/Global-Powers-of-Luxury-Goods-abril-2019.pdf> 15, 42

[3] LVMH, Houses, <https://www.lvmh.com/houses/#:~:text=LVMH%20is%20home%20to%2075,exquisite%20caliber%20of%20its%20products.&text=Our%20group%20of%20wines%20and,no%20other%20in%20the%20world> last accessed 22 December 2020

[4] Commission approves joint acquisition of Fendi by LVMH and PRADA (European Commission, 26 May 2000) <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_00_535> last accessed 22 December 2000

[5] Commission of the European Communities, LVMH / PRADA / Fendi (2000) COMP/M.1780 [16]

[6] ibid

[7] ibid [22]

[8] ibid [11]

[9] ibid [10]

[10] Shubhodip Chakraborty, Interplay Between Competition Law And IPR In Its Regulation Of Market (Lawctopus, 15 November 2015) <https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/interplay-competition-law-ipr-regulation-market/#:~:text=Intellectual%20Property%20Rights%20(IPR)%20consists,adverse%20effect%20on%20the%20market> last accessed on 23 December 2020

[11] Sarah Lindig, This Iconic Bag is Still the Most Exclusive in the World (Harper’s Bazaar, 14 June 2015) <https://www.harpersbazaar.com/fashion/trends/a11201/hermes-birkin-bag-most-exclusive-in-the-world/> last accessed 22 December 2020

[12] Hermès <https://www.hermes.com> last accessed 23 December 2020

[13] LVMH / PRADA / Fendi (n 6)

[14] Commission of the European Communities, Coca-Cola/Amalgamated Beverages GB (1997) IV/M.794 [136-138]

[15] George Arnet, Gucci on Track to Hit €10 Billion in 2020 (Vogue Business, 26 April 2019) <https://www.voguebusiness.com/companies/gucci-sales-reach-euro-10-billion> last accessed 24 December 2020

Learn more about Fashion Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Legaleye Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Categories
Blog

Impact Of Covid-19 On Foreign Direct Investment and Related Laws

By Deepakshi Aeran

ABSTRACT

Covid-19 has locked up the world over. For such a deadly virus, not a single nation is safe. This condition is not the first time in the world. Earlier world encountered this form of deadly virus known as “influenza / Spanish flu” in 1918. After battling and coming out of that situation after 100 years, here stands a new challenge in front of the world. The question is that how this crisis has turned out for various nations. Covid-19 has hit the nations hard irrespective of it being a developed or developing ones; in every aspect possible. Stock markets have plummeted and many companies have to struggle with the economic damage. There is a great deal of uncertainty in global chains.

This article aims to bring light on how the pandemic has affected the Foreign Direct Investments and how governments are handling the havoc to come out of it with minimal damage, and may be taking some advantages for future.

Learn more about Foreign Direct Investment with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course Corp Comm legal!

INTRODUCTION

Over the years, every nation government is altering their policies with respect to Foreign Direct investment[1] to improve their economy and to enforce condition on their achievement. The Emerging trend of increasing Foreign Direct Investment is too focused on the national safety concerns, for example last year UK government involvement was in the future contract between Advent International and Cobham plc.

In recent years, countries such as the United States have interfered in proposed foreign direct investment (FDI) transactions to resolve national security issues, with a particular focus on China. The Covid-19 pandemic not only impacted on healthcare and critical infrastructure from an FDI viewpoint, but also undermined companies in other sectors and made them easy targets for creditors and opportunistic buyers[2].

Furthermore, due to Covid -19 many countries have amended their foreign direct investment polices to control or to protect their economy. Companies those who are interested in multinational business they have to be aware of these new polices

Similarly, the article further deals with how various countries are working out with their policies and guidelines, like EC, UK, AUSTRALIA, INDIA etc.

EUROPEAN UNION

Just at beginning of April 2020, Germany adopted legislation that would allow regulatory authorities to examine whether the acquisition would lead to a likely disorder of public order or security (instead of a real threat to public order or security). While this amendment was recommended prior to the spread of Covid-19, Germany also proposes to raise the number of sectors in which FDI will require a primary focus, a move that appears to be driven by the pandemic.

Spain[3] has also formally introduced a provision for prior governmental approval for:

  • Non-EU investors purchasing 10% or more of or gaining management rights in or controlling Spanish companies engaged in sectors such as telecommunications, data processing or storage, electoral or financial infrastructure and sensitive facilities, vital technologies and dual-use products (such as robots and semiconductors, as well as biotechnology) supply of key contributors (such as raw materials and food safety) and sectors with access to or ability to monitor sensitive information;
  • Foreign direct investment where the investor is owned explicitly or implicitly by the government of another country.

Italy – one of the worst impacted by Covid-19 – has also extended the scope of sectors in which FDI would require a prior government inspection.

Prior to the pandemic, there was a growing propensity for the Italian Government to use its powers to review the FDI. However, on 7 April 2020, the Italian Government dramatically expanded its authority, both to new sectors and to sectors already subject to the FDI rule.

Specially, prior approval is now needed for acquisitions of 10% or more by non-EU-controlled investors in new sectors – banking, insurance, food and health. The inclusion of health (and likely insurance) as a strategic field seems to be a necessary reaction to the pandemic. It is interesting that these tougher guidelines have also been applied to EU-controlled investors by the end of the year.

Learn more about Foreign Direct Investment with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course Corp Comm legal!

The French FDI regime has already been greatly improved by introducing the pre-planned changes that followed the pandemic. These wholesale amendments took effect on 1 April 2020 and, in short, expanded the spectrum of investment protected by the scheme, increased the list of strategic sectors to which the scheme applied, required substantive details to be given for approval, and increased penalties for non-compliance.

However, it was announced on 28 April 2020 that France would reduce the control limit for acquisition of non-European investors’ share capital of strategic French listed companies to 10% by the end of the year (against 25% at present).

This represents a major step-change from the pre-1st April 2020 regime by further restricting the control threshold, which was reduced to 25% just a few days earlier by the pre-planned reforms previously mentioned.

The whole reform comes in the sense of the French Government’s declaration of its intention to shield national companies from the danger of overseas takeovers during the COVID-19 crisis. Moreover, the French government has recently highlighted its comprehensive use of FDI powers in barring the acquisition by the US Teledyne of the French company Photonis (which develops applications for military use) – although the decision was not linked to COVID-19, it nevertheless represents a significant milestone.

Learn more about Foreign Direct Investment with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course Corp Comm legal!

UNITED KINGDOM

The National Security and Investment Bill was released in the Queen’s Speech on 19 December 2019. The latest legislation follows the introduction of an EU system that would replace the current powers of the UK Government to deal with mergers and acquisitions under the Enterprise Act 2002.

The UK government will have power to “scrutinise investments and consider the risks that can arise from hostile parties acquiring ownership of, or control over, businesses or other entities and assets that have national security implications.”[4]

New powers apply to transactions in any industry, irrespective of the profitability or market share of the parties. The United Kingdom Government’s proposals are currently lacking in detail, but appear to build on those set out in its 2018 White Paper, which was included in the Advent / Cobham Agreement Warning. The three main components of the proposed law are as follows:

  • A notification system allowing businesses to flag deals with potential security concerns to the government for quick, efficient screening.
  • Powers to mitigate risks to national security – by adding conditions to a transaction or blocking as a last resort, plus sanctions for non-compliance with the regime.
  • A safeguarding mechanism for parties to appeal where necessary.[5]

AUSTRALIA

Given that Europe was declared to be the epicentre of the Covid-19 pandemic in March, the above-mentioned steps may have been anticipated. However, countries in other continents have also taken serious measures – for example, Australia has temporarily amended its FDI legislation with effect from 29 March 2020 in the national interest to deal with the economic implications of the spread of Covid-19, Following which all potential foreign investments subject to the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeover Act 1975[6], where the other requirements for notification are met, would now require prior regulatory approval, irrespective of size or existence of the foreign investor.

A number of temporary but substantial changes to the Australian FDI system were announced on 29 March 2020. The Australian Government described these steps as “important to safeguard national interest as the outbreak of coronavirus exerts intense pressure on the Australian economy and businesses” and thus indirectly recognised the possibility of taking over the troubled Australian economy. These adjustments effectively make all FDI subject to review for the duration of the pandemic by reducing the financial criterion for review in terms of target valuation to AUS$0.

This represents a significant constriction of the system, especially when combined with the already relatively low cut-off for review (20 per cent or lower in some cases). Moreover, this is a particularly significant change for investors from countries that have free trade agreements with Australia (such as the USA) – those investors may initially benefit from a criterion of approx. AUS$1.2 billion for investments in some (non-sensitive) industries.

The Australian reforms are thus broadly extended to all international investors (to the possible advantage of domestic investors) and are in contrast to the more focused approach adopted in Spain, France and India.

Learn more about Foreign Direct Investment with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course Corp Comm legal!

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

In response to COVID-19, the United States Government has not proposed any new restrictions on foreign investment in U.S. companies or any amendments to the authority of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an interagency government committee approved to investigate such transactions involving foreign persons.

However, as a consequence of defaults on loans, debt restructuring and investment opportunities, the pandemic may put those forms of lending transactions into the public eye of the CFIUS review that would otherwise normally escape scrutiny.

In addition, international investors seeking opportunities in this environment should be conscious that investments made under the aegis of lending or funding transactions that still be subject to transactions or investments protected by the CFIUS assessment[7].

INDIA

The trajectory of history is always influenced by unpredictable shocks, and the outbreak of COVID-19 is one such epoch-defining occurrence that restores international trade order and global supply chains. In the framework of multinational firms, in particular Multi-National Corporations (MNCs), trying to hedge potential output shocks, India has emerged as a promising and significant alternative link in the current global supply chains. The larger geopolitical scenario, India ‘s liberal FDI policy, the government’s sectoral and institutional reforms, both at central and state level, and India ‘s wide and greater than the mean consumer market are among the many factors that underscore India ‘s attractiveness as an FDI destination.

In India, the development of the manufacturing sector has been largely hampered by the legacy of property, labour and logistics, the most critical factors of development. The Government is building a land pool of about 461,589 hectares for new projects, dramatically reducing transaction costs for investors. India is also pursuing wide-ranging reforms on labor issues. Reforms in these crucial factors of production have opened up several opportunities for foreign investors to invest in India by sending out positive signals.

Learn more about Foreign Direct Investment with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course Corp Comm legal!

Creating a strong base is a sine qua non for the growth and stability of the manufacturing sector, and investment in the sector needs to expand significantly to the maximum. A good reward system is known to be effective in channelling new investments. Recently announced production-linked incentive schemes for cell phone manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and medical devices have created a high level of interest among investors attempting to steal opportunities in these sectors. These schemes were developed with the intention of creating scale and size, with vertically integrated units, in the Indian manufacturing sector. Similar, initiatives for other sectors of strength are underway, and once unveiled, these schemes would further improve India ‘s position as a feasible alternative to China[8].

India is among the most liberal FDI policies in the world, where foreign investment of up to 100 per cent is allowed on an automatic basis in most sectors of the economy.

Foreign investment in only a few economic sectors is subject to limits on approval conditions or foreign investment ceilings. The number of sectors that are not open to FDI is small, and there are only a few industries, such as agriculture, where foreign investment is only approved for a restricted set of activities.

In addition, in the recently launched ‘Atma Nirbhar’ scheme[9], the honourable Finance minister launched a range of FDI related reforms. A declaration of an rise of up to 74% in FDI investment in the defence manufacturing sector is reflective of the government’s positive intention in the sense of FDI.

Over the period, the liberal FDI policy framework has helped India reap benefits of a greater inflow of foreign investment, which has risen faster than the country’s GDP growth rate. India’s GDP was $479 billion in 2001, and it is now $2.72 trillion. Around the same time, FDI inflows in India increased from $4.03 billion to $73 billion[10].

It is said that opportunities lie in adversity India is trying to leverage its plan to drive economic growth with a powerful manufacturing engine fuelled by rewards to attract FDI, and a wide domestic market. Moreover, with a renewed drive for changes, India is signalling pathways to the world that we welcome businesses.

CONCLUSION

The changes and developments made by various countries highlight the need for investors to carefully consider foreign investment. There may be many more changes and additions to the FDI policies to come and what restrictions we see is might be just the tip of an iceberg. Countries are posing restrictions and along with it trying to protect their economic and national interests as the virus is continuously spreading.

FDI is a major part of every economy and Covid-19 has really shackled the economies to the core. It is important for the nations to protect the domestic markets before focusing on foreign investments. And therefore, it is possible that other countries also impose barriers to its FDI, may be stricter, in long term in order to navigate through the storm.

Learn more about Foreign Direct Investment with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course Corp Comm legal!

[1] OECD (2008), Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment, 4th edition, www.oecd.org/investment/fdibenchmarkdefinition.htm

 

[2] https://taxguru.in/finance/corona-impact-indian-economy.html

[3]Royal Decree-Law 8/2020, 17 March 2020: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=177aae39-e8f4-4916-912c-5d5f758f1367

[4] Available at, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b6dbafd1-2b1b-4610-9260-ebf535b834a6

[5] Available at, https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/perspectives-events/publications/2019/11/uk-government-remains-committed-to-adopting-new-national-security-review-legislation

[6] Available at ministers.treasury.gov.au.

[7] Available at, https://www.reedsmith.com/en/topics/coronavirus-covid-19-resource-center-need-to-know-business-legal-issues

[8] Available at, https://www.mondaq.com/india/financing/923078/covid-19-impact-government-of-indiaamends-foreign-direct-investment-policy-to-regulate-chinese-investments-into-india

[9] Available at, https://www.prsindia.org/report-summaries/summary-announcements-aatma-nirbhar-bharat-abhiyaan

[10] Available at, https://www.news18.com/news/opinion/india-to-emerge-as-favourable-fdi-destination-post-coronavirus-2732193.html

Categories
Blog

Corporate Social Responsibility and the related provisions in India and USA (Impact of COVID-19)

By: Anmol Sharma

In these times of crisis, a strong commitment to the well-being of stakeholders is of utmost importance. Companies around the world are currently facing sharp drops in demands that puts job at risks, threatens the income of suppliers and local communities in which we erode the confidence of providers finance to firms. Therefore welcome that companies around the world are stepping up their social responsibilities activities examples are Unilever a British dutch conglomerate that donated soaps, sanitizer, bleach, and food. German chemical company BASF gave away over 100 million masks and supplied health care facilities with hand sanitizers for free of charge. Microsoft grants its worked 12 weeks of paid parental leave because of school disruption. Another example could be of Danone, they announced to guarantee all employment contracts and wages onto the summer to extend childcare and health care programs and to put in place a 300 million euro find to support fragile suppliers.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Likewise in India Ratan Tata had donated INR 1500 Crores to the government, being the biggest industrialist he donated such big amount of money in this pandemics and he even stated that if the country needs more help I might sell my company or everything I had earned till yet for the country, some of the bug donations had been done by Actor Akshay Kumar who donated an amount of Rs. 35 Crores to the government of India. Reliance industries donated INR 500 Crores to the PM cares meant for Covid crisis. SCR money can be helpful in ongoing pandemic situation of Covid-19, to run community kitchens, provide shelters to homeless and stranded migrants labourer example: to support to civil society responding to food relief. It can prevent deterioration in gains made in Area of child rights, girl rights for example: lots of children may be pushed into child labour, malnutrition may rise, under age marriage of girls given more poverty.

CSR is not philanthropy, Rather responsibility towards society. A way to achieve balance of Economic, Social and Environmental imperatives. As per Companies act 2013, 2% of profit should go for certain CSR related activities such as Environmental protection, Girl education, Nahi Kali(Mahindra).

CSR (Corporate social responsibility) comes in 2007 in India & in USA it truly began in 1971. In India company act it is mandatory provision under section 135 of company act 2013, which came into effect from 01.04.2014 on the other hand in USA CSR (Corporate social responsibility) is type of soft law which do not requires a statue or regulation that means hard law but is nonetheless seen as obligatory by most corporations because of consumer expectations and internal norms. Principles of building the legal shell specifically in interpreted rights, duties, and causation, are mainly worldwide embraced. Thus, corporates must have CSR schemes that are “litigation ready” when it requires human rights because the UNGPs would be informed about the content of sensible corporate practices, which had censorious implications for multinational civil and commercial disputes. That is to say, UNGPs (The United Nations Guiding Principles) make multinational tort liability of corporations to 3rd parties.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

CSR (Corporate social responsibility) is basically bringing consciousness about society, surroundings, environment and that is where the CSR brings in the stake holder perspective to think about society & have those consideration in the mind of businessmen basically when they are discussing strategy. [1]The capitalists should act as a trustees (not owners) of their property and conduct themselves in a social responsible way. This concept actually measures financial, social & environmental performance of the corporation. [2]The Business Responsibility Reporting (BRR) are mandated for requirement of top 100 (from 500 to now top 1000) lasted entities in their annual report. In todays world 90% of CEOs claims that Sustainability is key to success. Research shows that if you have good CSR programme it will increase employee commitment, customer satisfaction, reduce risk and even get better access to finance. The good example of irresponsibility is Volkswagen case, Volkswagen is known to be the most responsible companies top-rated on different screens and still it turned out that they had tampered with their emission technology and that of course led to major drop in their brand value but its also read to a drop in their share prices of the companies.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Top management of corporate sector is not going to do the Job but they have to endorse the activities on the CSR so the first thing then is to put together a group of company across the company 5 to 10 people from different department and they together are going to find out and discuss what this companies main social impact or the main footprints of the company, a good check list for that is the sustainable development with 5 goals the SDGs of course those 5 goals are relevant for individual companies depends upon which secretary they’re in so first will be MAP lets say companies and the industry of producing clothing in developing countries well probably decent work and economic growth is most relevant or if company is in oil industry then climate action issues is relevant and if the company is in fish farming well then it would be life below water is more important. When the goals are identified a concrete plan with concrete target and how to reach the target must be set up when that is ready we move on to the second step that is TEST take the draft plan presented to key stakeholders ask for their input revise accordingly who are stakeholders like customers, suppliers other employees, non governmental organisation, environmental organisation these are ones to to come with feedback and then revise  the plan according to that then we’re ready for the third step which is LAUNCH the launch is about making the rest of the company aware of the plan and let them buy into tithe day-to-day work how do you do that, put it on a company website or newsletter or monitors be creative. The fourth step is the IMPLEMENTATION have you had to follow up the plan, are we reaching the targets are we not why there will be unexpected happenings these are great learning point. Now the last and fifth step that is REPORTING the reporting is like accounting coming forward with what worked or what didn’t work and why, and, be open and be honest and transparent not only focused on what went went well but also the problems the challenges one might think that companies with big CSR report are doing a lot of things are being good companies but actually its not true its the opposite way around companies with the big report writing a lot those are the ones who have been criticised and have to explain that they have changed and convinced the reader the CSR reports are good source of finding out to which extent the CSR work is actually integrated into the company.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Working practices of the corporate company have been totally changed since this pandemic of Covid-19 and turn corporate company to work on different platforms, for example, to work from home is mandatory these days as offices are still closed for time being for the safety of their own. This measure had been taken worldwide whether it’s India or the USA or any other country as this the social responsibility of corporate sectors to make sure that people are safe during these pandemics and they won’t suffer any monetary problems.

The legal department of the corporate sectors is still analyzing and evaluating the effects of this pandemic on contractual relationships of all sorts, as well as the consequences of Covid-19 on contractual relationships of all sorts, also as possible mitigating strategies which will have to be compelled to be implemented. In particular, the performance of contracts that one can reasonably expect to be impacted by the spread of coronavirus (a sizable amount of contracts of all kinds, indeed) would require deep analysis to verify whether or not they include the act of God clauses that would potentially and ultimately excuse performance from any (or both) parties within the event an unforeseen scenario. In this scenario, the legal departments will play a crucial role in this pandemic situation where they had to make a strategy for the corporate sectors so that it favors the corporate sector rather than affecting them. Even the Boards of the company had to come forward with strong leadership as they had several commitments towards their company. We are now seeing great samples of true leadership that goes beyond direct responsibilities within companies to a way larger scale: Leading initiatives that, because of the large power of globalization and therefore the scale of social and professional networks, have a really powerful reach. According to section 135 of the companies act, CSR spend is mandatory for every company beyond a financial threshold, Net worth of INR 500 Crores or Turnover of INR 1000 Crores or Net Profit of INR 5 Crores, required to spend 2 % of average net profit of last 3 years on CSR projects, reports made under clause (0) of sub-section (3) of section 134 specify the reasons for spending the amount. On the other hand in the USA, there are corporate foundations in the companies where spending money on CSR is also mandatory, recently [3]500 firms spend around $20 billion a year on CSR activities.

Section 135 of the companies act, the compliance of constitution of the CSR committee of the board 3 or more directors, at least 1 independent director, CSR committee shall formulate and recommend CSR policy (preference to be given to local), recommend CSR activities and expenditure on the same, monitor CSR policy from time to time, with this the responsibility of The Board as follows –

  1. Disclose composition of CSR committee.
  2. Approve CSR policy and report.
  3. Ensure SCR activities and undertaken by company
  4. Ensure spending on CSR activities and reporting of non-compliance.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Now, on the other hand, the same business laws are there in the USA where it is mandatory for every company to spend on CSR and The Boards of the companies had to take measurable steps to ensure their responsibilities.

 Like we talk about today’s time then one of the most crucial steps taken under CSR in all the companies is that they had to make sure that all the departments including there buildings must be sanitized properly not only in India or USA but this is world-wide like in India it is set up by the central government for the promotion of sanitation, likewise in the whole world including the USA and other countries it is mandatory that to sanitized every building and keep sanitizer bottles or packs for employees so that they can be safe during this pandemic.

On other hand in India work from home is a new format which is not as successful as where employees work as in the office premises but yes during this pandemic this rule has to be followed by every corporate sector same as in the USA this step of work from home has been taken up and been followed up there also for the care of employees.

In India promoting education, including special education and employment vocation skills especially among children, women, elderly, and, the differently ables and livelihood enhancement projects.

On 23.02.2020 in India funds may be spent for various activities related to COVID 19 under item no. (i) and (xii) of Schedule VII relating to the promotion of health care, including preventive health care and sanitation, and, disaster management (including state Disaster Management Fund).

28.03.2020: contribution to PM cares fund shall qualify as CSR expenditure under item (vii) of Schedule VII.

[4]The SALARY of the employees during the lock-down and payment to casual/contractual workers – not CSR, any ex-gratia payment is made to temporary/ casual workers/ daily wage workers over and above the disbursement of wages. Specifically to fight COVID-19, the same shall be admissible towards CSR expenditure as a one-time exception provided there is an explicit declaration to that effect by the Board of the company, which is duly certified by the statutory auditor.

On the other hand in the USA, there are cuts of salaries during lockdown even the former president didn’t do much about it but Newly appointed president Biden said that corporate sectors must pay the salary to there employees in this pandemic situation as it is difficult not only for corporate sectors but people of the country who are working in the corporate sectors are also suffering a lot in this Pandemic situation even the Government is also facing monetary problems in the whole world.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

CSR can be good for a company, first it can builds good image, responsible behaviour which gives competitive advantage, can act as a marketing strategy. CSR can be for government by helps government in achieving its social objectives welfarism concept.

BENEFITS TO CSR, Lack of awareness will be resolved, lack of interest of local community in participation of CSR activities will be tackled, an opportunity to build trust and synergy between CSR, NGO and Local bodies. All these will be a precursor in institution of CSR in India as well as in USA.

[1] Gandhis Concept of “Trusteeship”

[2] SEBI has, vide circular dated August 13, 2012

[3] Fortune Global, https://hbr.org/2018/01/stop-talking-about-how-csr-helps-your-bottom-line#:~:text=Today%2C%20Fortune%20Global%20500%20firms,for%20attracting%20and%20motivating%20employees

[4] Schedule VII Companies act COVID NOTIFICATION

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Categories
Blog

Analysis of the Legal aspects of Mining in Nigeria

By: Sree Kuttan

Introduction

Nigeria is regarded as a country endowed with abundant natural mineral resources such as iron, lead-zinc, tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold, manganese, and nickel. In Nigeria, there are a number of laws applicable to the mining sector such as the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), Land Use Act, Laws of the Federation 2004 (the Land Use Act), Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act, 2007 (the Mining Act), Nigerian Minerals and Mining Regulations 2011 (the Mining Regulations). The Act and the regulations have since introduced a better regulated sector and provided an attractive investment climate for foreign investors seeking to invest in the mining sector.

The Mining Act

The Mining Act is Nigeria’s major legislation governing the mining sector. It regulates all aspects of the exploration and exploitation of solid minerals in Nigeria. The Mining Act also provides that all lands in which minerals have been found in commercial quantities shall be acquired by the Federal Government in accordance with the Land Use Act.

The Mining Regulations

The Mining Regulations are the subsidiary legislation issued under the Mining Act. The Mining Act and the Mining Regulations are administered by the Ministry of Mines and Steel and the Mining Cadastre Office.

Learn more about Energy Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Atharva Legal!

The Land Use Act

The Land Use Act is Nigeria’s legislation governing land acquisition and ownership. However, the use of land for mining purposes is considered as constituting an overriding public interest. , the Mining Act also provides for contractual arrangements applicable to the lawful use of any land for mining purposes.

Licences and Permits Applicable to the Mining Sector

Under the Mining Act, a person is authorized to search for and exploit mineral resources when he or she has obtained a mineral title to do so. The different mineral titles available under the Act are: Reconnaissance Permit, Exploration Licence, Small-Scale Mining Lease, Mining Lease, Quarry Lease and Water Use Permit.  It is an offence under the Act to undertake or be involved in the search or exploitation of mineral resources without having the requisite mineral title.

  • Reconnaissance Permit:

This permit allows, on a non-exclusive basis, reconnaissance activities on all land within Nigeria that is available for mining operations. In Nigeria, a reconnaissance permit allows the holder of the permit to only obtain access into, enter or fly over any land within Nigeria to search for mineral resources on a non-exclusive basis and to remove surface samples in small quantities. A reconnaissance permit is not transferrable or assignable to a third party under any circumstance whatsoever16 and where the holder of the permit becomes mentally incapacitated or diseased, the permit shall be revoked.

  • Exploration Licence:

An exploration licence gives its holder the exclusive right to conduct exploration activities within the area permitted. In order to be qualified to apply for an exploration licence, an applicant has to be either a company that has been duly incorporated under Nigerian law or a mining co-operative or the holder of a reconnaissance permit already granted in respect of the area which is the subject of the exploration permit application. In Nigeria, an exploration licence is granted for an initial period of three (3) years and may be renewed for two further periods of two years.

  • Small-Scale Mining Lease:

Small-scale mining is defined under the Mining Act as artisanal, alluvial and other forms of mining operations involving the use of low-level technology or application of methods not requiring substantial expenditure for the conduct of mining operations within a small-scale. A small-scale mining lease shall not be granted in an area which is the subject of an exploration licence, small-scale mining lease, mining lease, quarry lease, or water use permit or any area close to mining operations.

  • Mining Lease:

A mining lease grants the holder of the mineral title the right to obtain access and enter the mining lease area to carry out exclusive exploration and exploitation of mineral resources activities. In Nigeria, only a corporate body duly incorporated under the Companies and Allied Matters Act or any other legal entity which has demonstrated that a commercial quantity of mineral resources exists in an area is qualified to apply for a mining lease. Mining leases are required to be granted or denied by the Minister within 45 days of application. A mining lease is valid for a period of twenty-five years and renewable every twenty-five years and shall not be granted in respect of any area within an exploration licence area or a small-scale mining area except to the holder of the exploration licence or small-scale mining lease covering such area.

Learn more about Energy Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Atharva Legal!

  • Quarry Lease:

Quarry leases in Nigeria are granted in respect of all naturally occurring quarriable minerals. A person shall be ineligible to apply for a quarry lease if it is shown that any of the members or directors of the applicant or a shareholding holding a controlling share of the applicant has been convicted of a felony or an offence under the Mining Act or the Mining Regulations.

  • Water Use Permit:

Only the holder of or an applicant for an exploration licence, small scale mining lease, mining lease, or quarry lease is qualified to apply for a water use permit under the Mining Act and the Mining Regulations. The validity of a water use permit is for as long as the small-scale mining lease, mining lease, quarry lease or exploration licence for which use it was granted and shall expire upon revocation or expiry of the small-scale mining lease, mining lease, quarry lease or exploration licence for which use it was granted.

Fiscal Incentives of the Nigerian Mining Sector

Of paramount importance to any mining investor are the fiscal regime and tax incentives of the host country. Under Nigerian mining laws, a mining project is entitled to enjoy various tax advantages, incentives and benefits as follows:

  • In determining total profits, a licence holder is entitled to deduct from his assessable profits Capital allowance of 95% of qualifying expenditure incurred in the year in which the investment was made on all certified exploration, development and processing expenditure including feasibility studies, sample assaying costs, and infrastructure costs.
  • The amount of any loss incurred by a licence holder shall be deducted as far as is possible from the assessable profits of the first year of assessment and thereafter in the year which the loss was incurred and in so far as it cannot be so made, then from such amounts of such assessable profits of the next year of assessment and so on up to a limit of four years after which the period any unregistered loss shall lapse.
  • Exemption from customs and import duties on approved plants and machinery, equipment and accessories imported specifically and exclusively for mining operations.
  • Tax holiday for the first 3 years of operation which period may be extended for another 2 years. The Tax relief begins to accrue on the commencement of operations. This is at odds with CITA which only grants tax holiday of 3 years without any option of extension.
  • Expatriate Quota and resident permit in respect of expatriate quota
  • Personal remittance quota to expatriate personnel for the transfer of foreign currency out of Nigeria.
  • Free transferability of dividends or profits;, payments in respect of servicing a certified foreign loan; and foreign capital in the event of sale or liquidation of mining operations in any convertible currency.
  • The Central Bank of Nigeria(CBN) may permit a title holder who earns foreign exchange from the sale of its minerals to retain in a foreign exchange domiciliary account a portion of his earnings for use in acquiring spare parts and other inputs required for mining operations which would otherwise not be readily available without use of such earnings.
  • Grant of investment allowance of 10% on qualifying plant and machinery.
  • Tax deductible for environmental cost.
  • Tax deductible for pension funds for employees of mining companies.
  • Annual Capital Cost Indexation-unclaimed balance of capital cost shall be increased yearly by 5% for mines that start production within 5 years from the date of enactment of the Act.
  • Deferment of royalty payments on any minerals for a specific period on the approval of the Federal Executive Council.
  • The investor may also be entitled to claim an additional rural investment allowance on its infrastructure cost. This is however dependent on the location of the company and the type of infrastructure provided.

Learn more about Energy Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Atharva Legal!

Considerations for Mining Operations

Before the commencement of mining operations by a mineral titleholder, there are certain legal considerations that a person interested in mining business in Nigeria must take into cognizance such as lands excluded from mining operations, surface rent and compensation, outright ownership of mining land, annual service fees and royalties.

  • Lands Excluded from Mining Operations
  • Surface Rent and Compensation
  • Ownership of mining land
  • Annual Service Fees and Royalties

Incentives Applicable to Mineral title Holders

A mineral title holder under the Mining Act engaged in mining operations under the Act and the Regulations is entitled to certain benefits;

 

  • Extension Services for small-scale and artisanal mining
  • Capital Allowances
  • Exemption from Customs duty and Other Benefits
  • Permission to Retain and Use Foreign Exchange and Free Transferability of Foreign Exchange
  • Pioneer Status and Tax-Deductible Costs

Learn more about Energy Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Atharva Legal!

Factors Impeding Development of the Mining Sector

Given that the Nigerian legal and regulatory framework meets all the major considerations of a mining investor, it is difficult to understand why the survey conducted by the Fraser Institute ranks Nigeria so low and the World Bank’s forecast for mining investment in Nigeria between the years 2000 and 2020 is nil. This may not be unconnected with the following:

  1. Security: Majority of the naturally occurring minerals are located in the schist belt which covers an extensive part of Northern Nigeria where the present insurgency is being experienced. Security is one of the main risks to any mining investment as it has a bearing on the overall cost of the project. As the government improves the security situation in these parts of the country, mining juniors and TMC’s may begin to refocus their attention to Nigeria.
  2. Funding: There is a challenge of funding mining projects. Mining projects have long lead times and as such require long term capital which simply is lacking in Nigeria presently. Perhaps with the introduction of the single treasury account and limitation of focus on short term funds, banks may be forced to start providing longer term funding to sectors such as the mining sector.
  3. Infrastructure: The lack of adequate infrastructure is also a challenge to any mining investor. The mineral deposits in Nigeria are too distant to the ports for the export market and there is presently very little domestic use for the minerals presently being produced. The railway system is archaic and in need of a complete overhaul to be able to serve the sector. In the absence of a functional railway system, Nigeria won’t see any major mining investment in the immediate future. It is crucial to begin to look at various models of how the needed transportation infrastructure for mining activities can be provided. One model could be the use of Public Private Partnership to deliver multi-client/multiuser mining related rail infrastructure in Nigeria. The pension funds are also a veritable way of funding the infrastructure investment for the sector.
  4. Illegal Mining: Illegal mining contributes to about 60% of the mining activities in Nigeria. This is perhaps the biggest challenge to the mining sector. However, the loss of revenue is not the only by product of illegal mining as same also results in the degradation of the environment and loss of human life mainly from lead poisoning.
  5. Political and Economic Risk: Nigeria has witnessed 16 years of uninterrupted democratic rule and more recently the transition of power from a ruling party to an opposition party. This clearly signifies political stability to any foreign investor seeking to invest in the solid mineral sector. The ongoing devaluation of the Naira posses its own hindrance to investment but there are ways of addressing currency risks in mining projects and this includes currency hedging.

Recommendations for the Sector

There are a number of recommendations and these include:

  1. The urgent need to improve on the funding of the public mining institutions so as to ensure effective monitoring and regulation of mining activities.
  2. The spate of illegal mining must vastly reduce so as to ensure order and prevent environmental degradation and loss of life.
  3. The Federal Government must as a matter of urgency address the security situation in the northern region of Nigeria which is ore rich.
  4. Enforcement of the “use it or lose it principle” with respect to licences which are not utilised within a specific timeframe.
  5. Improved mining related transport infrastructure through Public Private Partnerships.
  6. Identify a specific set of minerals to promote through roadshows showcasing the potential of mining these minerals in Nigeria.
  7. Privatisation through competitive bidding of existing Federal Government mining properties as a means of kick stating the sector.

Conclusion

As Nigeria plans to take advantage of the inherent growth opportunities available in the morning sector and open the sector to private and foreign investment and investors, it is important for all players, new and existing players to be aware of the regulatory and commercial considerations for the mining sector in Nigeria. As being the largest economy in Africa, with a population of 170 million inhabitants to provide skilled and unskilled labour and a transparent legal and regulatory framework offering some of the best fiscal incentives in the global mining industry, offers attractive mining investment opportunities to the discerning investor.

Learn more about Energy Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course certified by Atharva Legal!

 

 

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Tortious Liability of Companies in India and USA

By: Prashant Pathak

 

“A tort is a common wrong for which the cure is an activity for unliquidated harms and which isn’t solely the penetrate of an agreement, or the break of a trust, or the penetrate of other only impartial commitment”- Salmond

The term ‘tort’ was brought into the phrasing of English Law by the French talking legal counselors and Judges of the Courts of Normandy and Angevin Kings of England. As a specialized term of English law, misdeed has gained an exceptional importance as a types of common injury or wrong. Till about the center of the seventeenth Century misdeed was a dark term, when method was viewed as more significant than the privilege of a person. This accentuation on procedural perspective for deciding the accomplishment for a case proceeded for exactly 500 years, till 1852, when the Common Law Procedure Act was passed and supremacy of substance over the technique progressively picked up firmer ground. Today the adage as it stands seems to be ‘ubi jus ubi remedium’, for example where there is not too far off is cure.

Tort is what might be compared to the English word ‘wrong’ and of the Roman law term ‘delict’. The word misdeed is gotten from the Latin word ‘tortum’ which means contorted or abnormal or wrong and is as opposed to the word rectum which implies straight. It is required out of everybody to act in a clear way and when one goes astray from this straight way into screwy ways he is said to have submitted a misdeed. Thus misdeed is a lead which is wound or slanted and not straight. In spite of the fact that numerous conspicuous essayists have attempted to characterize Tort, it is hard to do as such for shifted reasons. The vital explanation among this being, that the law of Torts depends on chose cases. Judges while choosing a case, feel their essential obligation is to decree the situation close by as opposed to set down more extensive guidelines and consequently they only from time to time set out any meaning of a lawful term. Besides the law of misdeed is as yet developing. On the off chance that a thing is developing no acceptable definition can be given.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

TORTIOUS LIABILITY:

It is relevant to comprehend what is implied by tortious obligation or rather the idea of misdeed law to comprehend its utility. To toss all the more light, the word misdeed developed, from at one time very nearly passing into abstract use as an equivalent for wrong yet after the center of the seventeenth century, a training started in the courts of the customary law, of recognizing activities in ‘contract’ for breaks of agreement and activities for different wrongs, and of utilizing the word ‘misdeed’ as a succinct title for the last class of activities. From that point forward it was regular to discuss ‘activities in agreement’ and ‘activity in tort'[1]. So a misdeed came, in law to allude to that specific class of wrongs for which an activity in misdeed was perceived by the courts of customary law as a cure and to lose the nonexclusive feeling of wrong which it might have helped in well known use.

Another fascinating consequence of this relationship of the word with a type of activity was that it came to allude likewise to the obligation of an individual who didn’t submit any misdeed or wrong, for example an expert who is sued for the harms by the individual harmed by a misdeed submitted by his servant[2]. This was on the grounds that an ‘activity in misdeed’ was the cure against the expert and in course of time and because of new requirements and conditions, the expert was held subject to pay harms despite the fact that he had not submitted any misdeed. So the law of misdeeds is that assortment of law which manages the risk of people against whom an ‘activity in misdeed’ would lie.

tort as we probably am aware today has developed throughout the long term and has filled immensely in nations, for example, the England, United States of America, and other reformist nations and partly in India. The primary investigation in this article anyway would spin around two parts of this part of law, initially, regardless of whether the law of misdeed in India is pointless and besides, whether the law of misdeeds has been basically disregarded. Prior to proceeding onward to the center subject it is basic to completely comprehend the significance of the term misdeed in the Indian setting.

TORT LAW IN INDIA:

In India the term tort has been in presence since pre-freedom time. The Sanskrit word Jimha, which means warped was utilized in antiquated Hindu law text in the feeling of ‘tortious of fake conduct’.[3] However, under the Hindu law and the Muslim law, misdeed had a much smaller origination than the misdeed of the English law. The discipline of violations in these frameworks involved a more noticeable spot than pay for wrongs. The law of misdeeds in India as of now, is mostly the English law of misdeeds which itself depends on the standards of the custom-based law of England. Anyway the Indian courts prior to applying any standard of English law can see whether it is fit to the Indian culture and conditions. The utilization of the English law in India has consequently been a particular application.

“We need to develop new standards and set down new standards which will enough arrangement with new issues which emerge in a profoundly industrialized economy. We can’t permit our legal deduction to be built by reference to the law as it wins in England or for the matter of that in any far off nation. We are absolutely set up to get light from whatever source it comes yet we need to construct our own law.”

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

During British standard, courts in India were charged by Acts of Parliament in the UK and by Indian institutions to act as per equity, value and great still, small voice if there was no particular principle of authorized law relevant to the contest in a suit. As to suits for harms for misdeeds, courts adhered to the English customary law to the extent that it was consonant with equity, value and great still, small voice. They left from it when any of its standards seemed nonsensical and unsatisfactory to Indian conditions. An English resolution managing misdeed law isn’t by its own power pertinent to India however might be followed here except if it isn’t acknowledged for the explanation just referenced.

TORTIOUS LIABILITY OF COMAPANIES IN INDIA:

The law of torts in India depends on the standards of the English Common Law. Be that as it may, it has been adjusted to meet the nearby necessities. A portion of the significant standards of misdeeds incorporate carelessness, disturbance, trespass, vicarious obligation, severe and supreme risk. In setting of the current article, we will center upon the ideas of exacting and total obligation versus the two outstanding modern fiascos in India.

  1. a) Doctrine of Strict Liability

The regulation of “severe risk” advanced in Fletcher v. Rylands. For this situation, Rylands employed temporary workers to assemble a supply on his territory. While building it, the contractual workers found a few imperfections and left them unfixed. After some time, Rylands’ repository burst and overflowed Fletcher’s bordering mine causing £937 worth of harm. Blackburn, J. believed that any individual who for his own motivations welcomes on his property and gathers and keeps there anything liable to do underhandedness, in the event that it gets away from should keep it at his hazard and in the event that he doesn’t do as such, is at first sight responsible for all the harm which is the regular outcome of its escape.

  1. b) Doctrine of Absolute Liability

The guideline of “outright risk” was first historically speaking applied by the Supreme Court of India in M.C. Mehta v. Association of India (popularly known as Oleum gas spill case). For this situation, oleum gas spilled from a manure plant of Shriram Foods and Fertilizers, Delhi and made harm a few people. A forthcoming public interest suit (PIL) by M.C. Mehta gave the occasion to the Court to pass a progression of requests managing the eventual outcomes of gas spill. For this situation, the Court objected the utilization of the standard of severe risk

  1. Bhopal Gas Tragedy

Association Carbide India Limited’s (UCIL) plant at Bhopal was planned by its holding organization Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), USA and was inherent 1969 for making pesticides, created by responding Methyl Isocyanate and Alpha Naphthol. An occurrence of gas spill occurred in the Bhopal pesticide plant of UCIL the evening of 2-3 December, 1984 making extreme misfortune the lives of individuals in the region. Individuals were presented to this gas all around the city and the quick impacts were hacking, retching, serious eye disturbance and a sensation of suffocation. A huge number of individuals passed on quickly, and lakhs of individuals continued perpetual wounds.

Then, the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985was passed by Parliament to give certain forces on the Central Government to make sure about that cases emerging out of, or associated with, the Bhopal gas spill fiasco, are managed expediently, successfully, impartially and to the best bit of leeway of the petitioners and for issues coincidental thereto. This Act made the Union Government illustrative of the casualties of the misfortune and permitted them to record suits for their sake. Alongside this, an out of court settlement between the Government of India and Union Carbide was shown up at, which fixed the risk of the organization to pay $470 million according without limit and last settlement, everything being equal, rights and liabilities emerging out of that fiasco. With everything taken into account, it was a terrible move, as the settlement restricted the liabilities for the cases which were recorded later. It is a hard certainty, however it is as clear as open air that $470 million dollars were not adequate to remunerate all the harmed. Truth be told, it is not really 15% of the first case of $3.3 billion.

The pay granted was around Rs. 1 lakh for the groups of the individuals who lost their lives, Rs. 50,000 for forever harmed and Rs. 25,000 for briefly harmed.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

TORTIOUS LIABILITY OF COMPANIES IN USA:

ENTITY LIABILITY:

The idea of element obligation permits an enterprise to be held at risk for the criminal wrongdoings of its representatives if (1) the specialist is acting inside the real or evident extent of their business or authority and (2) if the specialists mean, in any event to some degree, to some way profit the organization through their activities. The organization can at present be held at risk for their representatives’ criminal offenses or activities regardless of whether the specialists’ activities are in opposition to corporate strategy or straightforwardly dismiss express requests of the enterprise. This standard was set up in New York Central and Hudson River Railroad v. US, 212 U.S. 481 (1909), where the court chose to expand the misdeed precept of respondeat better than criminal cases, setting up a type of corporate criminal obligation for activities of company’s representatives.

ARE AMERICAN COMPANIES LIABLE FOR TORT COMMTITED ABROAD?

In Ogoniland, Nigeria, ecologically concerned protestors were beaten, assaulted, and murdered for shows contradicting forceful oil advancement in the Ogoni Niger River Delta. Nigerian nationals brought suit under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in the Southern District of New York, asserting that unfamiliar enterprises that work together in the United States helped and abetted these atrocities. In Kiobel v. Illustrious Dutch Petroleum Co., the Supreme Court held that unfamiliar organizations are not dependent upon obligation in the United States for tortious acts outside of the United States. Be that as it may, on the grounds that Kiobel managed an unfamiliar enterprise, the assessment left open whether or not a United States organization could be at risk for tortious acts outside of the nation, and the open inquiry brought about a circuit split. The Fourth Circuit has held that American partnerships can be sued for acts submitted outside of the United States, while the Eleventh Circuit has extended Kiobel and expressed that American courts need ward over these cases, hence excepting them in that circuit. The Fourth Circuit’s thinking is a superior examination of cases brought under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) on the grounds that the resolution was proposed to give a solution for outsiders harmed by Americans. Thusly, the United States has a commitment to give a gathering to noncitizens to get pay for misdeeds submitted by Americans in different nations. Moreover, the ATS was made to manage an American resident’s lead outside of the United States. Without a court authorizing this commitment, companies have minimal solid motivation to screen workers’ potential tortious exercises abroad.

Kiobel v. Illustrious Dutch Petroleum Co.

 In Kiobel, Nigerian residents claimed that the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and Shell Transport and Trading Company helped and abetted the Nigerian government in viciously stifling fights against forceful oil advancement in Nigeria. The offended parties looked to recuperate in United States court under the ATS for the savage, tortious acts submitted in Nigeria. The ATS gives that “the region courts will have unique purview of any considerate activity by an outsider for a misdeed just, dedicated disregarding the law of countries or a deal of the United States.” The offended parties asserted that the organizations abused Nigerian law. On allure, the Supreme Court confronted the issue of whether an ATS case could gives harms to activities by non-American enterprises a working in an unfamiliar area. The Court depended on a legal standard known as the “assumption against extraterritorial application” to discover that the ATS doesn’t cover these claims. The Court held that the assumption against extraterritorial application applies to claims under ATS, yet that nothing in the resolution counters that assumption, so the ATS didn’t matter to the cases in Kiobel. Further, all pertinent lead in Kiobel occurred outside of the U.S.However, the Court expressed that if claims “concern the domain of the United States,”they can refute the assumption against extraterritorial application, yet should have adequate power to do so. Thus, this holding left open whether or not government courts have position to hear claims with respect to tortious acts submitted outside the United States yet that “contact and concern” the United States by prudence of their American tortfeasors.

Learn more about Corporate Law with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

 

Categories
Blog

Analysis of Cyber Laws in UAE, Australia And China

By: Apoorva B N

ABSTRACT

In the modern swift- moving world, computers and internet are no more a privilege. Internet facilities have become a necessity as it is the par on course for any individual’s life today. Today, we have achieved so many advancements in the technological arena that it is next to impossible to even imagine our lives without computers or the internet. Now that internet has made its way to almost every aspect of human life, along with its blessings are its share of dangers and threats that haunt individuals today. In order to regulate the use of internet and everything that comes with it, ‘Cyber law’ emerged as a necessary facet of law. Cyber law deals with disputes arising in the internet domain, including matters like data protection, privacy concerns, identity left, electronic signatures, information technology and security. As information technology is looking at advancements taking place at a rapid rate, law regarding its regulation also needs to be updated at the same rate. In India, the main legislation that seeks to regulate information technology and related aspects is the Information Technology Act, 2000. Various amendments are being made to this legislation from time to time to be on par with the technological advancements that are taking place in the IT field. Similarly, this article aims to get an understanding and a brief analysis of the cyber laws of other jurisdictions like UAE, Australia and China.

INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT)

Technological advancement is one of the most important factors contributing to a country’s economy. It also brings about modern rapid changes to the social lives of the individuals. Advancement in technology and science brings about rapid growth in employment opportunities thereby increasing the GDP of the country that enriches the economy as a whole. Information Technology is the study and use of computer systems to store, retrieve and send information.[1] In order to regulate information technology, especially facets of it including internet law, information and digital security, IT law or cyber law has emerged as a necessary aspect of law.

Learn more about Cyber Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

CYBER LAWS IN UAE

UAE is said to be the most digitally advanced Arab country. It had also made its place in the top 20 digital economies in 2018[2]. In 2017, two breakthrough digital initiatives, the Dubai Internet of Things (IoT) Strategy and the Digital Wealth Initiative, were launched[3]. Securing an important position in the word for being digitally advanced, UAE has its own set of cyber security laws for the regulation of the cyber threats and like offences that form a part of any technological advancement. Therefore, the UAE has a comprehensive legislation on cyber laws called the ‘Cyber Crimes Law 2012’ (UAE-Law No. 5 of 2012)[4]. Few of the important offences and penalties that are covered under this legislation are—

  • Promoting or publishing pornographic material or indecent act and gambling activities.
  • Publishing of others information and photos on internet
  • Violating others privacy by eavesdropping and publishing the information using the social media
  • Human Trafficking
  • Data Forgery of prohibitive data
  • Unauthorized use and interception of computer services

Penalties for imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years and a fine up to 200,000 AED.

The National Electronic Security Authority (‘NESA’) implements the Cyber Law and regulates the protection of communications networks and information systems in the UAE.[5] The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (‘TRA’) was established by the Telecommunications Law to supervise the telecommunications division in the UAE. The TRA set up the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) to advance the standards of information security and protect the IT set-up.

Information Security Regulation (ISR) standards from Dubai Smart Government mandates government entities in Dubai to implement requirements and controls stated in the standard to ensure appropriate level of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets.[6]

These were the key features of the Cyber law infrastructure in the UAE.

Learn more about Cyber Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

CYBER LAWS IN AUSTRALIA

The legislations that deal with cyber and Information technology laws in Australia are as follows[7]—

  1. Australian Privacy Principles (APP): It is an amendment made to the Privacy Act, 1983 including various other amendments like—
  • The Privacy and data protection Acts, 2014-Victoria ;
  • Privacy and data protection Act, 1998– New south Wales;
  • Privacy and information Act, 2009– Queensland;
  • Personal information Privacy Act, 2004– Tasmania;
  • Information privacy Act, 2014– Australian capital territory;
  • Information Act, 2002– Northern territory.
  1. The Cybercrime Act, 1995: In August 2012, the Government passed the Cybercrime Legislation Amendment Act 2012(Cth) (CLAA). The purpose of the CLAA was to empower Australia to assent to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (Cybercrime Convention), the only international treaty on cybercrime. The Cyber Crime Act, 1995 was very much based on the international convention on cybercrime and it contains various offences relating to the unauthorised access, modification, or impairment of data and restricted data (sections 477.1, 477.2 and 478.1 of the Criminal Code).
  2. TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 1997—The main objective of this legislation is to protect the privacy of individuals who use Australian telecommunication systems related to real time communications.[8]

These were the key Cyber law legislations of Australia and their objectives.

When it comes to high tech crime or cybercrimes of national importance, the accountability of investigation and response is conferred to Australian Federal Police (AFP). They possess jurisdiction over cases of cybercrime concerning online frauds affecting any governmental institution. Their jurisdiction further ranges to the investigation of cases related to virtual child sex harassment and exploitation, child protection and tourist child sex offenders.[9]

The Director of Public Prosecutions prosecutes on violations relating to unauthorised admission to data, damage caused to electronic communication and use of carriage services to harass or cause a wrongdoing, within sections 478.1(1), 477.3(1) and 474.17 of the Criminal Code (Cth).[10]

The New South Wales Police are conferred with powers to investigate and prosecute online fraudsters in offences in areas like internet banking, mobile banking, phishing, mule recruitment, shopping and auction site fraud, scams, spam and identity theft, child sexual exploitation and cyber bullying offences.[11]

Learn more about Cyber Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

CYBER LAWS IN CHINA

The Chinese Government has always laid emphasis on the advancement in science and technology. Their innovation model includes huge projects in areas like Nano Technology, biotechnology, aircrafts, high-end generic microchips etc. Cybersecurity law of the People’s Republic of China was enacted by the e Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on November 7, 2016 and was enforced on June 1, 2017. The key features of the cyber law of China are as under[12]—

  1. Security obligations of ISPs
  2. Rules for the transnational transmission of data at critical information infrastructure
  3. Rules for personal information protection
  4. Principle of cyberspace sovereignty

It also provides intricate rules and definitions on legal liability for various unlawful conducts, and sets a range of punishments like fines, suspension for modification, withdrawal of licenses and commercial licenses among others. The law therefore enforces cybersecurity and administrative authorities with powers and duties to implement the law against illegal activities.

Relevant cases in China[13]—

Sina Weibo v. Maimai (2016) was the first unfair competition case concerning big data analytics in China. The central issue for the court to decide was whether the alleged “unauthorized collection and use of data” and its related activities constitute unfair competition under the Anti- Unfair Competition Law. The case is a landmark decision to address one of the important questions on competition for data resources in the internet industry: to what extent data scraping (both personal data and other data) targeting a competitor could be potentially caught by the rules of unfair competition.

Tencent v. Douyin (2019) – case concerning the ownership of users’ ID, nicknames and profile pictures.

Facts: Douyin had entered into a Developer Agreement with WeChat and QQ platforms, and had access to users’ WeChat and QQ IDs, nicknames and profile pictures. Douyin had shared those data with Duoshan, a social networking product run by its affiliate. WeChat and QQ platforms claimed that the unauthorized use of IDs, nicknames and profile pictures of their users constitute unfair competition. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining Douyin from using those user data until the date of final judgment. It remains to be seen whether the court would consider the case following the same logic of the Maimai case.

Learn more about Cyber Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

CONCLUSION

We can therefore conclude on being able to have understood the meaning and importance of information technology and how it has become an inevitable and a significant aspect of human life today. We also understood the IT laws or cyber laws that are codified in various jurisdiction across the world, like UAE, Australia and China. By the above stated information, it is safe for us to conclude that among the countries whose cyber laws have been discussed in this article, China appears to be the most technologically advanced country thereby making it better equipped in IT or cyber laws to regulate the threats that will be posed with technological advancements. Secondly, UAE is also seen to have been making efforts and taking efficient steps to get their IT or Cyber law infrastructure well- equipped. Australia appears to be relatively backward in terms of technological advancements in comparison with China and UAE. But Australia’s latest technological advancements have given rise to good legal backing by way of the cyber law legislation of the country.

Learn more about Cyber Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

[1] ‘WHAT EXACTLY IS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT)’, workforce.com, https://www.workforce.com/news/what-exactly-is-information-technology-it

[2] CLEOFE MACEDA, ‘UAE MOST DIGITALLY ADVANCED IN ARAB WORLD’, GULFNEWS, https://gulfnews.com/technology/uae-most-digitally-advanced-in-arab-world-1.2239034

[3] Ibid.

[4] BASSAM ZA’ZA’, ‘UNDERSTANDING UAE’S CYBERCRIME LAW AND PENALTIES’, GOING OUT, SEPTEMBER 12, 2015 07:00, https://gulfnews.com/going-out/society/understanding-uaes-cybercrime-law-and-penalties-1.1564565#:~:text=the%20uae%20cybercrime%20law%20no,and%20seriousness%20of%20the%20cybercrime.

[5] IBID.

[6] COMPLIANCE AND DATA PROTECTION SERVICE, RNS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, https://www.rnstechnology.com/compliance-data-protection/#:~:text=information%20security%20regulation%20(isr)%20standards,compliance%20with%20local%20regulations

[7] KING & WOOD MALLESONS, ‘AUSTRALIA’S CYBERCRIME LEGISLATION’, LEXOLOGY, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4ab62fdd-f177-47eb-b02d-e327cf9833a9

[8] “Cybercrime Laws in Australia.” lawteacher.net. 11 2018. All Answers Ltd. 12 2020 https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/australian-law/cybercrime-laws-in-australia-8255.php?vref=1

[9] PAVUL LEGAL, ‘CYBERCRIME LAW IN AUSTRALIA’, PAVUK, 2 June 2018, https://www.pavuklegal.com/cybercrime-law-in-australia/

[10] PAVUL LEGAL, ‘CYBERCRIME LAW IN AUSTRALIA’, PAVUK, 2 June 2018, https://www.pavuklegal.com/cybercrime-law-in-australia/

[11] Ibid.

[12] LAUREN MARANTO, ‘WHO BENEFITS FROM CHINA’S CYBERSECURITY LAWS?’, CSIS, https://www.csis.org/blogs/new-perspectives-asia/who-benefits-chinas-cybersecurity-laws#:~:text=In%20June%202017%2C%20the%20China,for%20China’s%20present%20day%20guidelines.&text=The%20law%20requires%20that%20data,to%20government%2Dconducted%20security%20checks.

[13] Recent privacy case law update in China, Dentons, file:///C:/Users/Apoorva%20Narendranath/Downloads/8b0990bc-f987-428d-b3c1-4eea30fbce82.pdf

Categories
Blog

Role of Flag States under United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

By: Shubham Bhalla 

INTRODUCTION

 The development of flag states started in 1000 BC. The Egyptians used them for the first time for identity purposes. The usage of flag advancement increases in the Stone Ages for identification and in middle age, it has been used as a symbol of the nation. The Law of the Sea Convention explains the duties of Flag States on a large scale in comparison to previous conventions. In Public International Law, it is concerned within the maxim used in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases, Opinio Juris et necessitatis, refers to the psychological element representing the State that acts as they are fulfilling a legal Requirement which is obligatory for them. It also represents the establishment of an International Custom which has been sought for recognition earlier among other states, in the condition of taking certain practices obligatory.[1]

Learn more about  Maritime Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

In the early 19th Century, the ‘Lotus case’ revealed the essential for creating a new customary rule of International Law i.e Opinio Juris. In this case, it has been seen that even if the state has no jurisdiction in exercising their power over crimes committed on High Seas in respect to the Flag States then the French Government had no proof for the act, which had legal obligation over. This case has been criticized majorly for allowance of all those things which is not forbidden under International Law. Later, it has been overruled through the Geneva Convention on Law of Sea, 1958 by application of Article 11 of the convention, stated as ‘No criminal or disciplinary proceedings, except before the judicial/administrative authorities of either the flag State or of the State of which they are citizens, can be initiated against the persons responsible for the collision’.[2]

The practice of State establishes the coastal state in exercising its jurisdiction beyond the territorial jurisdiction by taking control of foreign vessels, to prevent the threat and enforce their rule of law. The example of North Sea Continental Shelf Cases is classical here which speaks about the provision of universal jurisdiction concerning the crimes of piracy. In today’s phenomenon, States are not free to see the resources of the sea, it is due to the “conservation and Co-operation” under Modern International Law. It is all related to the requirement of new legal order which combined as the balance of interests, between exploitation and conservation of the sea Law, from free seas to clean seas and from the peaceful uses and Strategic considerations to the balance between the Coastal Interests and Flag Interests.

The freedom of Sea well explained by the Jurist Lauterpacht, “Freedom of the seas’ true purpose is to ensure freedom of navigation, unhampered by exclusive claims of the seas’ true purpose is to ensure freedom of navigation, unhampered by exclusive claims of individual States, and freedom of utilization of the sea resources to a degree to which they can be equitably utilized by all”.[3]

WHAT IS ‘FLAG STATE’?

The state will be called “Flag State” where the Ship has been registered in that particular Country. It is deemed to be a Home Country for a Ship. The Flag state has the overall responsibility to ensure that the ship or vessels flying its flag in compliance with the International Treaties, Conventions, Regulations, and other Laws applicable. Here, the inspection is carried out within the issue of certificate every time, which is based on National regulations and ratified by that Flag State. So, Safety is measured by the authority. It is a planned perspective as there is the issuance of certificate after every inspection. The flag State does not maintain any threat matrix as compared to Port State under Public International Law. [4]

In the case of Naim Molvan v. Attorney General for Palestine[5], the court held that the ship sailing without the flag of any state has no right of freedom of navigation. This case put a legal regime of a vessel on the seas. The flag helps in settling the responsibility where Rights should be applicable concerning that particular vessel. The flag gets its recognition with the codification of the usage under the High seas convention and ultimately under the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982.

ROLE OF FLAG STATE 

  • ARTICLE 94- DUTIES OF FLAG STATES

Every State shall efficiently execute its power in administrative, technical, and social matters over ships flying its flag. Law of the sea convention prescribes in the second Para of Article 94, a duty of the flag State to maintain regular checks upon the seaworthiness of ships, to maintain a register of the vessel, to take measures to ensure safety at sea concerning the construction, equipment, and seaworthiness of the vessel.

To ensure that crews are qualified, to hold inquiries into shipping casualties, to effectively exercise jurisdiction and control over their Ships, the manning of ships, and labour conditions, etc.

Article 94(1) the matters on which the flag State is to exercise its duties is made precise, that is jurisdiction and control over administrative, technical, and social events. This provision, also present under the 1958 High seas convention, was added to strengthen the concept of concerning the nationality of a vessel by indicating matters over which the flag State should exercise its jurisdiction. The United Nations Convention on Conditions for Registration of Ships 1986 amplifies the objective set out.

Article 1 – It prescribes that the flag State is to apply the provisions of that convention to ensure or, as the case may be, strengthening between a State and ships, fly its flag and, to operate effectively. Its jurisdiction and control over such ships concerning identification and accountability of ship owners and operators as well as concerning administrative, technical, economic, and social events.

The reference there to economic matters has no direct counterpart in Article 94, but that has mentioned the comprehensive character of the obligations imposed on flag States generally throughout the UNCLOS, this slight widening of the purpose served by registration and of the duties of the flag State is compatible with the UNCLOS.

Learn more about  Maritime Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

  • ARTICLE 94(2) – REGISTER AND ASSUME JURISDICTION:

Flag states are required to keep a record of ships flying their flag & to allow jurisdiction under its internal laws over each vessel, its masters as well as crew in administrative, technical, and social matters concerning the ship. For this, the requirement is that the register should contain the names of the vessel and in particular, nothing further requirements were mentioned within this provision.

Article 11 of UNCLOS, on the other hand, sets out in considerable detail the information that should be in a record of a vessel.

  • ARTICLE 94(3) – CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPMENT, AND SEAWORTHINESS OF SHIPS

(b) Crew of ships, labour requirements, and the Coaching of crews taking into account the suitable international instruments;

(c) Utilisation of signals, the maintenance of communications, and the prevention of collisions.[6]

  1. Each vessel before registration is surveyed by a qualified surveyor of ships and should have proper navigational equipment as are appropriate for the safe navigation of the ship. International Maritime Organization is a very specialized agency of the United Nations which is liable for actions to promote the safety and security of international shipping and to prevent marine pollution from ships.
  2. Every vessel has a head which is a master and officers who have proper qualifications and various crew members who have proper qualifications for their work as engineers etc. Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974 commands a universal responsibility on flag States to ensure, for the safety of life at sea, the appropriate manning of the ship.

Learn more about  Maritime Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Standard of Training, Certification, and watchkeeping of Seafarers (STCW) 1978, as amended, contains a comprehensive set of international regulations concerning training and certification of personnel. This Convention establishes minimum requirements for training, qualifications, and seagoing service for masters and officers and certain categories of ratings, such as those forming part of a navigational watch or engine-room watch on, Oil Tanker, LPG, etc.

  1. To ensure safety at high seas means of communications are vital for accident prevention and safety. To exercise its jurisdiction the flag states must take necessary measures regarding the use of signals and maintenance of communications and prevention of collision. The Act for the prevention of collisions at sea is found in International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea 1972.

Learn more about  Maritime Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Rules on signals: Under Safety of Life at sea (1974) all vessels are required to carry radio installations.[7]

  • ARTICLE 94(5) – CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS;

Similarly, with regards to article 94(3) and (4), subsection 5 stresses that flag state is required to conform to “generally accepted” international regulations, procedures, and practices and to take any steps which may be necessary to secure their observation. Internationally accepted regulations and practices are dictated by practical necessity. While each state remains free to apply its legal requirements as regards safety, there would be chaos if these requirements widely varied or were incompatible. This provision is questionable to a range because the law and procedures to be adopted are not defined. It also does not give guidance as to what legislation could be classified as “generally accepted”. Thus one could go ahead to understand it to mean rules and standards established through competent international organizations or general diplomatic conferences to bridge the reluctance of states to impose strict safety legislation due to competition in the industry. So, a nation might be compelled to standards it did not specifically adopt. Examples of particular rules, procedures, and standards include Safety of life at sea (SOLAS), The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), etc. Flag states by this article, are under obligation to take any steps necessary to ensure observance of generally accepted international regulations and procedures. Including those related to safety, marine pollution, and the maintenance of radio communication.

  • ARTICLE 94(6) UPON RECEIVING A REPORT FLAG STATE SHALL INVESTIGATE THE MATTER.

In this article, the country has the right to use its power if the flag state has not exercised proper jurisdiction and control concerning a ship flying its flag, to report its facts to flag states. Upon receiving the report the flag state is to investigate the matter and will take remedial steps if necessary. This article calls for good faith on the part of flag states; it also re-emphasises the exclusive jurisdiction of flag states over vessels flying their flag on the high sea.

  • Article 94 (7) Inquiry into every marine casualty or incident of navigation on high seas

Few flag states are consistent in investigating casualties involving ships properly registered under their flag. They also make reports which show that they are working in the field for collecting the reason for which these casualties are happening. The Marine Accident Investigation Branch is very productive and a good example compared to other organizations. This article applies to the incidents which cause casualties like loss of life or very serious injuries to nationals of different states, damages to ships, or the marine environment. In this Flag state and other states who have a dispute will cooperate and conduct such inquiry. SIMO plays a very vital role in uniting other states for smooth conducting of such inquiries and the betterment of their mutual interest.

Learn more about  Maritime Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

INDIAN SCENARIO IN RESPECT TO THE CASE, The Italian Republic v. The Republic of India[8] (Enrica Lexie Incident)

In this case, two Italian mariners working under Vessel Protection Detachment (VPD) posted on Enrica Lexie, an Italian commercial vessel, shot two Indian Fishermen mistaking them to be pirates in contiguous waters (20.5 nautical miles off the coast of Kerala). Thereafter, the Indian navy and coastguards detained the two Italian marines.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (hereinafter referred to as PCA) held that Italy was guilty of violating India’s freedom and right of navigation under the United Nations Convention for the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) Article 87 (1) (a) and 90. India and Italy had concurrent jurisdiction over the incident and a valid legal basis to institute criminal proceedings against the mariners; however, their immunity as state officials acts as an exception to the jurisdiction. The mariners will now be tried in Italy and given a sentence according to their domestic laws.

COMMENTS:

While delivering the judgment, the PCA did not acknowledge the presence of natural rights of a person which cannot be violated in furtherance of official duty. Furthermore, the case has established a dangerous precedent where it will be difficult for India to protect its innocent unarmed citizens from such acts done without provocation in the future.

[1] Dr. Ashok k. Jain, PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW & HUMAN RIGHTS [LAW OF PEACE], (Third Edition 2010).

 

[2] S.S. Lotus Case (1927) PCIJ, Series A No. 10.

[3] SUPRA NOTE 1.

[4] Dr. ASHOK K. JAIN, PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW & HUMAN RIGHTS [LAW OF PEACE], Third Edition 2010.

[5] 81 Ll L Rep 277.

[6] Mafia.org. (2020). Article 94. Duties of the flag State. [online] Available at: https://maifa.org/resolution/resolutions/UNCLOS%2094.htm [Accessed 15 Dec. 2020].

 

[7] Nordquist, Volume III, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, a Commentary at 149.

[8] (2013) 4 SCC 721.

Learn more about  Maritime Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Categories
Blog

Copyright Licensing Agreement and the Clauses Covered Under It- An Analysis

By: Darshi Sanghvi

What is copyright licensing?

In India, copyright is known by and large as an ownership right offered by law to creators, for instance, of artistic work, cinematography, literature and sound recordings. In other words, it is a protection provided to creators of work in the form of an acknowledgement for their intellectual contribution. The primary objective of any copyright is to protect the interest of the creator, besides the dissemination of knowledge that is carried out. An often undiscovered fact is amidst other benefits; economic rights also enable a creator to reap economic benefits from his intellectual creations. As per the Copyright Act of 1957, there are different rights in place, pertaining to the nature of the work undertaken. It is further pertinent to note that it is the exclusive right of the owner to do or authorise doing any of the acts covered thereon.[1]

Learn more about Intellectual Property Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

The copyright framework permits not only the communication of work, but also its reproduction, translation and adaption. Thus, the owner of the copyright work is given the opportunity of generating wealth not just by exploiting it himself, but also by sharing it with the public at large for mutual benefits. This is where copyright assignment and licensing come into play.  A distinction may be drawn between licensing and assignment, in terms of the fact that through licensing, the licensee is granted rights on the basis of certain conditions, however their ownership is not vested in the licensee. On the other hand, in an assignment, the assignee is regarded as the owner of the interest assigned to him.

Through copyright licensing, the licensor grants a license to the licensee, thereby authorising the use of the said copyright by such a licensee. The licensee is thus provided with the adequate protection and spared from the claim of infringement unauthorised use that may be made by the licensor otherwise.

Furthermore, the term ‘Exclusive License’ is elaborated in the Copyright Act to comprise of licenses that confer, on the licensee or any other person duly authorised by him, any right pertaining to the copyright of the work, excluding all the other persons.[2]

In exchange of a consideration, a copyright owner may choose to transfer some or all of his rights to others for the purpose of seeking monetary benefits. A license may either be said to be exclusive, or non-exclusive.[3]

Learn more about Intellectual Property Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

What is a copyright licensing agreement?

In order to initiate licensing, a copyright owner enters into a contract, widely known as the Copyright Licensing Agreement. Through such a contract, the copyright owners permit another individual or organization to use their work in several ways, for instance:

  • For reprinting
  • For distribution
  • For using it over a specified period of time[4]

In a nutshell, it is an agreement that throws light on how, why, when and where a copyrighted work can be capable of being used.

Types of copyright licensing agreements

  • Voluntary License – The author, also known as the Copyright owner, is said to have exclusive rights with regard to his creative work and has the sole right to grant license in that respect. The Copyright Act 1957[5] provides that the owner of the copyright may grant the interest in his copyright through a license in writing, which must be signed by him or an agent duly authorised by him to do so. Such a license can be granted with respect to existing as well as future work. A voluntary license may be exclusive, non-exclusive, sole or implied.
  • Compulsory License[6]– As a part of the Berne Convention[7], India has taken a step towards the incorporation of a compulsory license under the Copyright Act 1957. The term “compulsory license” is used to mean a statutory license that provides an exclusive right to do an act without the prior permission of the copyright owner/ author. Section 31 covers the compulsory licensing of copyrighted work that is withheld from the public.

Important clauses to be included in Copyright Licensing Agreements

An agreement begins by stating the date and place of its execution and further proceeds towards identifying the contracting parties. This lays the foundation for the following clauses that are particular to the property or rights that are granted.

  • Recitals: This clause is considered essential for any form of agreement as it is used to provide a gist about the contracting parties. This clause sets forth the relationship of the parties up to the stage before which the agreement came into being. A well-drafted recital plays its part in clearly expounding the context of the agreement to any reader, thus enabling a person unknown to the agreement to comprehend it better. Nevertheless, it also clarifies the fact that the binding clauses of the agreement are to be included in the coming clauses and not the recital itself.
  • Definition: This clause is equivalent to a dictionary for the purpose of the agreement. It elucidates all the terms of immense importance to the agreement, which play an important role in determining the rights and obligations of the parties. Definitions can additionally be used for the purpose of restricting the scope of the agreement. A precise description of the terms like “licensed patents”, “use”, “royalty”, “revenue” etc. can be found within this clause.
  • Rights Grant/ Grant of license: This clause plays a significant role in enabling the parties to understand the extent to which the license extends. The Rights Grant clause irons out the significance of the rights granted by the Licensor to the Licensee. The said clause states several points like the “Exclusivity of the license”, “right to use”, “restrictions on use” and “limitations- geographical and political”. Most importantly, it acts as a guide by specifying “who gets what”. The clause clarifies that the Artist retains his right to reproduce his work and that the license remains with the artist and does not affect the ownership of the copyrighted work.
  • Indemnification: In the event of any litigation risk or loss arising on one party as a result of the act of another or due to the existence of any defect in the license granted or the ownership of the copyright, it is essential to discuss the specifics of who will be indemnified and who will be the indemnifier if such a risk comes true. In other words, this clause provides the right to the party suffering due to the act of another party to call upon him to indemnify the suffering party for any loss that may have incurred.
  • Consideration: Consideration forms an essential part of any contract, unless it is expressly mentioned otherwise. The consideration clause of a license agreement cites the amount of consideration that a licensee is required to pay to the licensor, in the form of royalties. The clause further sets out the method by which such royalties are to be calculated. According to most of the agreements, the royalties paid are based on the profit made by the licensee by exploiting the license. Besides such a royalty, the licensor is also entitled to demand a fixed license fee to be paid, which can be taken separately from the royalty. Both, the fee and the royalty depend on a number of factors, for instance, the use of work, the Artist’s reputation, the scope of the license, so on and so forth. The licensor also possesses the right to formulate a condition obligating the licensee to keep track of the sales made by him and to show the licensor such audit reports that shall be prepared by him.
  • Obligations of the Parties: Every party contracting under a license agreement has certain obligations towards each other which differ and are over and above the aforementioned clauses. These obligations involve making disclosures with respect to the information which is required to be known by both the licensor and licensee; in case the grant is of an exclusive license then the licensor agrees not to exploit the exclusivity granted to him thereunder; and may also contain a clause that obligates the licensee to exploit the copyrighted property in a manner that enables him to make the most of the license granted to him, much more so in case of exclusive license which exclusively grants him the license to exploit particular copyrighted work.

Learn more about Intellectual Property Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

  • Alterations and modifications: Alterations or modifications of any sort that may be made by the licensee must first be granted under the rights grant clause. If, upon granting any such right, modifications are made in the work, then the licensor might demand to be the owner of such property post the requisite improvement and shall then assign such improved property under another license with identical conditions as the previous agreement. Under certain circumstances, the licensee might seek to retain the ownership of the improved property, and then the licensor might obtain a license from the licensee for the purpose of including the modified part in his original work.
  • Term and termination: This clause lays down the period for which a license is granted to the licensee, the focus being on the date when it comes into force and the date on which it ceases to exist. Such a license possesses the scope of being renewed from time to time, subject to the conditions as specified under the agreement or at the will of parties. Term of the license is finalised by the concerned parties bearing in mind their respective benefits. Termination of an agreement is by and large based on two factors: at convenience and for cause. More often than not, parties don’t prefer granting the opposite party a right to terminate the contract at convenience as it may lead to a loss to the other party who might have invested a huge amount of money with a view of exploiting the licensee or the granted rights. One party is entitled to immediately terminate the agreement, if the other party does an act that is considered as a breach of any term of the agreement. This clause also puts out the consequences of termination of the license for any reason whatsoever. Nevertheless, in case of termination of the agreement at convenience, the party bringing about the termination of the agreement can, under obligation, be compelled to give a prior notice of certain period before such termination is implemented.
  • Dispute Resolution: In case of any dispute arising between the parties with regard to any breach of the agreement or any other reason pertaining to the license. Majority of the agreements elucidate the process to be followed in case of a conflict. The form of dispute resolution that must be opted for, can be decided at the discretion of the parties, which can be chosen from normal litigation, arbitration, mediation, and conciliation. The parties are at their will to decide the manner of dispute resolution and the law governing them.[8]

This is a non-exhaustive list of clauses essential to the agreement entered into between a copyright owner and the person seeking rights to reproduce or perform that copyrighted work. Copyright license agreement should be drafted, bearing in mind the protection of the rights of the Licensor as well as the Licensee. Furthermore, each clause must stipulate the rights, obligations, and limitations expressly, such that any future misunderstandings and misconceptions can be avoided on the part of the parties.

Learn more about Intellectual Property Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified Diploma course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

 

[1] Section 14 of Copyright Act 1957

[2] Section 2(j) of Copyright Act 1957

[3] https://ssrana.in/ip-laws/copyright-law-india/copyright-licensing-in-india/

[4] https://vakilsearch.com/advice/copyrights-in-india-how-to-assign-and-license-a-copyright/

[5] Section 30 of Copyright Act 1957

[6] Section 31 of Copyright Act 1957

[7] Article 9(2) of Berne Convention

[8] https://www.gspkendra.com/2018/12/27/most-important-clauses-in-a-copyright-licensing-agreement

Categories
Blog

Analysis of Banking and Investment Laws in USA, UK and UAE

By: Manas Maheshwari 

Introduction

Banks are the most important element of the Financial System of any country. The Economic Development Indicator depends on the efficacy and efficiency of the banking system prevailing in that particular country. The core function of Bank is to accept deposits and lend money thereby acting as an intermediary between depositors and borrowers. The income of  Bank is difference between rate of interest charged to the borrowers and the rate of interest paid to the depositors. This is the traditional function of Banks. In modern times like now, Banks including Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) perform various other value added services to its customers like foreign exchange transactions, providing distinct types of loans other than business loans such as car loans, home loans, education loans etc. , advisory and consultancy services, hire purchase financing, insurance services and many more. The Banking is not limited to the Commercial Banking operations alone. It has widened its limits and has reached the stage where the Investment Bank’s role in the economic development has come into play. The Investment Bank performs dual functions like acting as an underwriter, book manager to the issue, merchant banker, registrar in primary securities market from side of the corporate issuer. The Investment Bank also advises the clients mainly, Institutional Investors about the Buy and Sell side functions. The role of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) also comes into play when the commercial operations has been globalized and particularly when the capital is not at abundance.

Learn more about Investment and Banking Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Corp Comm legal!

Analysis of Banking and Investment Laws in UAE

As per the Doing Business Report 2020[1] published by the World Bank, the United Arab Emirates is ranked 16th out of 190 countries. This shows that UAE is gradually becoming  business and financial centric attracting a host of global banks corporate to set up their operations.

Currently, there are three types of Banks operating within UAE. These are:

  1. Commercial Banks;
  2. Islamic Banks and
  3. Foreign Banks.

The Islamic Banks are regulated by the Shariah principles as opposed to the commercial banks leading to many operational differences between the two. The popular banks currently operating in UAE are Emirates NBD, National Bank of Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, First Gulf Bank and Dubai Islamic Bank.

The UAE Central Bank is the primary regulator for Banking and Financial Services in UAE. Apart from Central Bank, there are various other regulatory bodies namely:

  1. The Insurance Authority (“IA”);
  2. The Securities and Commodities Authority (“SCA”);
  3. Dubai Financial Services Authority (“DFSA”) and
  4. Abu Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”).

The Regulatory authorities functioning within the federal level are the Central Bank, IA and SCA and those functioning within the emirate level are DFSA (operates within the Dubai International Financial Centre) and ADGM (operating within Abu Dhabi).

The Federal Law No. 10 of 1980[2] governs the Central Bank, the Monetary System and Organization of Banking. The Islamic Banks, Financial Institutions and Investment Companies are governed by Federal Law No. 6 of 1985[3]. The Decretal Federal Law No. 14 of 2018[4] covers the subject of Central Banks and Organization of Financial Institution and their activities. The SCA is governed by Federal Law No. 4 of 2000[5] and issues regulations from time to time which the companies operating in the securities market has to comply with. The IA regulates the Insurance sector in UAE in accordance with Federal Law No. 6 of 2007[6].

The DIFC, being an international Financial hub offers very vibrant environment w.r.t Commercial Banking and Investment Banking services. The laws related to this area of business are:

  1. Companies Law[7];
  2. Electronic Transactions Law[8];
  3. Insolvency Law[9] and
  4. Law of Security[10].

The Financial Collateral Regulations[11], Insolvency Insurers Regulations[12], Security Regulations[13] and Investment Companies Regulations[14] has been amended from time to time by DIFC.

The Central Bank of UAE issues licenses to foreign banks for operating in UAE as per the law that governs the domestic bank licensing. The Investment Banks cannot accept deposits whose maturity period is less than two years with some exceptions and these banks are licensed as per the relevant law[15]. The Islamic Banks can carry all types of Banking, Financial and Investment services and operations as per the relevant federal law.

Learn more about Investment and Banking Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Corp Comm legal!

Only authorized Institutions and Companies incorporated as per the Commercial Companies Law are licensed to act as moneychangers[16]. In respect of Financial Intermediaries involved in sale and purchase of stocks and bonds and in money market transactions, only UAE citizen in respect of natural person can act as an intermediary[17]. The responsibility for licensing brokers and intermediaries fall upon SCA in respect of shares and Central Bank in case of currency and commodities.

The Investment Companies as per the resolution[18] adopted by Board of Directors of Central Bank is involved in following businesses:

  1. Managing Portfolios;
  2. Preparing Allotment;
  3. Managing Investment Trust funds and
  4. Acting as a Trustee for managing funds on behalf of Beneficiary.

The Finance Companies undertake the following activities according to the resolution[19] adopted:

  1. Loans and Advances;
  2. Issuing credit guarantee and
  3. Issue of securities such as stocks, bonds, debt etc.

The Laws and Regulations governing Foreign Exchange are:

  1. Anti-Money laundering legislation[20] by Central Bank (To Register Hawala Providers);
  2. Anti-Money Laundering/Anti-Terrorist Financing Regulations[21] by DIFC and
  3. Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism[22] by DMCC.

In the midst of Covid-19 pandemic, the Central Bank of UAE have taken various measures relating to rescheduling loan payments, reducing charges for customers, deferring loan installments, encouraging customers to adopt digital banking services, to boost lending capacity of banks and to provide temporary relief to private sector and retail customers affected by Covid-19 pandemic and directed all banks to carry out sanitization of ATMs on regular basis[23].

Learn more about Investment and Banking Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Corp Comm legal!

Analysis of Banking and Investment Laws of UK

As per the Doing Business Report 2020[24] published by World Bank, United Kingdom is ranked 8th out of 190 countries. This establishes the fact that UK Laws and Regulations are business friendly.

Most of the UK laws partakes its character from European laws and regulations. The Primary framework for regulating Banking, Financial Services and Insurance sector in UK is Financial Services and Markets Act 2000[25] (“FSMA”). Apart from this, there are various domestic rules and regulations derived from secondary sources.

The principal regulators for Banks are:

  1. Bank of England (“BOE”);
  2. Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”), a division of BOE and
  3. Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”).

The BOE performs a statutory duty exercising its powers in the matter of resolution of Banks if a Bank is declared insolvent. The Financial Policy Committee (“FPC”) of BOE performs macro-supervision over Banking and Financial Sector. The Payments System is regulated by a Payment Systems Regulator and the issuance of Electronic Money is regulated by FCA.

The Primary function of PRA is to supervise the Banking and Insurance Companies[26]. The PRA also ensures proper mechanism of infrastructure in place for performing Banking related functions. It develops strategies in cooperation with the Companies to counter the crisis like situations. The PRA helps in ensuring a sound financial system is in place.

Till 2013, the Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) was the principal regulator for Banking and Financial Services industry. After 2013, the responsibility was divided between PRA and FCA.

The PRA and FCA are different entities working together and having a common aim. The FCA is responsible for ensuring fairness in the Financial Markets. It helps in ensuring a fair outcome for the consumers. The primary objectives[27] of FCA are:

  1. To protect the consumers;
  2. To protect the Financial Markets;
  3. To promote competition and
  4. To work in coordination with consumer groups, trade associations, professional bodies and other stakeholders.

The FCA is an independent public body and the main source of its income is the fees which it charges from its customers. The FCA is accountable to the Parliament and Treasury.

The activities that are regulated under the Banking and Financial sector are incorporated in the Financial and Markets Act (Regulated Activities) Order 2001[28] (“RAO”). Regulated Activities covers the following aspects:

  1. Accepting Deposits;
  2. Securities and Derivatives Business;
  3. Transactions in Investments;
  4. Insurance Activities;
  5. Mortgage Contracts and
  6. Consumer Credit.

In the wake of the global financial crisis in 2008, the UK economy went into a sharp recession. This was the time when the concept of Bank Ring-Fencing was developed. Under this concept, the retail banking services of the Bank were separated from the other services that the Bank offered and were prioritized. The Bank Ring Fencing helps in protecting the consumer banking services from the unexpected events which leads to global financial crisis like situations.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (“FSCS”) is a deposit insurance scheme which protects the consumers of the firms in financial sector that have failed.

The Consumer credit in UK is mainly regulated by Consumer Credit Act, 1974[29]. The Act regulates the following aspects:

  1. Credit card purchases;
  2. Credit agreements and
  3. Credit advertising.

Learn more about Investment and Banking Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Corp Comm legal!

The Banking Resolution aspect is incorporated in the Banking Act 2009[30]. The Bank of England is the UK’s Banking Resolution Authority. The Resolution regime is governed by the Bank of England’s approach to Resolution. This Resolution regime does not apply to the credit unions. The depositors of credit unions are paid out by FSCS up to a maximum limit of 85,000 pounds per credit union[31].

Due to Covid-19 pandemic, the FCA has also reviewed the disaster recovery plans in order to ensure that all the regulations have been complied with[32]. The UK’s exit from the European Union will also have a substantial impact on the Banking and Financial Sector.

Analysis of Banking and Investment Laws in USA

USA has a dual banking system put in place. Both the Federal Banks and State-Chartered Banks are operating in USA. The following categories of Banks are operating in USA:

  1. National Banks;
  2. State-Member Banks;
  3. State non-member Banks;
  4. Foreign Banks;
  5. Private banks;
  6. Industrial Banks and
  7. Trust Companies.

The Banks are required to obtain a charter before accepting deposits and continuing business[33].

The Primary Regulatory Authority for keeping a regulatory oversight over the Banking operation in US is the Federal Reserve System (“Fed”). The Federal Reserve System, being the Central Bank of USA is the primary supervisory authority over Bank Holding Companies, Financial Holding Companies, State Chartered Banks, Savings and Loan Holding Companies. The Federal Reserve is equipped with the following powers:

  1. Remove officers of Banking Companies;
  2. Imposing penalty and fines;
  3. Revoking Bank membership and
  4. Terminating activities of Banks.

The main functions[34] performed by Fed are:

  1. Formulate monetary policy;
  2. Stabilizing the financial system;
  3. Administering the payment and settlement system and
  4. Promoting the consumer awareness and community development.

Besides the Federal Reserve, other regulatory bodies operating in USA are:

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”): The OCC[35] is the primary supervisory authority having oversight over National Banks, Saving Banks and Foreign Banks having branches at federal level. The OCC is an independent unit of the Department of Treasury. It helps in ensuring that the Banks are accountable to customers and comply with the relevant laws and regulations.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation[36] (“FDIC”): It is an independent agency created to instill the confidence among the general public in the financial system. It insures deposits and supervises the state-chartered Banks. The responsibility of FDIC also lies in administering the deposit insurance fund and managing receiverships.

State Banking Agencies: The State Banking Agencies are responsible for supervising the banks operating at state level. The functions of this agency varies from state to state. Some common functions performed by these agencies are:

  1. Issuing Bank charters;
  2. Conducting examinations at Bank and
  3. Enforcing regulations and levying fines.

Some other important regulators[37] for Banking and Financial oversight are:

  1. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network;
  2. Federal Trade Commission and
  3. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is the primary regulator of Securities Market in USA. The primary objective of SEC is to protect the investors, develop efficiency in the securities market and to address investor grievances.

The derivative market in USA is regulated by Commodity Futures Trading Corporation (“CFTC”). The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) is a regulatory organization governed by chief insurance regulators of the respective states. The Insurance Laws are enacted by the respective state legislature under which insurance regulators operate. The legislations related to Banking in USA are:

National Bank Act of 1864[38]: This act performs the functions relating to establishing national banks, creating uniform national currency and establishing OCC.

Federal Reserve Act of 1913[39]: This act established the Federal Reserve System as the Central Bank of USA. The act sets out the framework for the operation of Fed and ensuring stable monetary and financial system.

Learn more about Investment and Banking Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Corp Comm legal!

Federal Credit Union Act[40]: This act establishes the National Credit Union Administration for governing the credit unions.

Federal Deposit Insurance Act[41]: This act establishes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation which will insure the deposits of all banks and saving associations. The FDIC is the primary regulator for state non-member banks.

Bank Holding Company Act of 1956[42]: This act gives enhanced powers to Federal Reserve by regulating the Bank Holding Companies.

International Banking Act of 1978[43]: This act brings foreign banks at par with the domestic Banks w.r.t regulations, capital requirements etc.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act[44] was adopted in 1999 for providing affiliation of Banks, securities firms and for safeguarding the personal sensitive data of the customers.

The Dodd-Frank act[45] of 2010 is a comprehensive set of regulations governing financial services borne out of great recession of 2008. The Act performs following functions[46]:

  1. Protecting consumers against any abusive lending and mortgages by Banks;
  2. Overseeing non-banking hedge funds;
  3. Establishing financial stability oversight council;
  4. Orderly shutdown of Banks if it becomes insolvent and
  5. Creating Volcker’s Rule which prohibits banks from owning hedge funds for their own purpose.

Besides these important acts some other important acts such as Bank Secrecy Act[47], Patriot Act[48] etc.

According to Doing Business Report 2020[49] published by World Bank Group, the United States of America is ranked 6th out of 190 countries. The Banking and Investment related laws in USA are quite business friendly and amended from time to time in response to the latest developments.

 

[1] The World Bank, Ease of Doing Business Rankings, Link.

[2] Union Law No. (10) of 1980.

[3] Federal Law No. (6) of 1985.

[4] Decretal Federal Law No. (14) of 2018.

[5] Federal Law No. (4) of 2000.

[6] Federal Law No. (6) of 2007.

[7] DIFC Law No. 5 of 2018.

[8] DIFC Law No. 2 of 2017.

[9] DIFC Law No. 1 of 2019.

[10] DIFC Law No. 8 of 2005.

[11] DIFC Financial Collateral Regulations, November 01, 2019.

[12] DIFC Insolvency (Insurers) Regulations, September 29, 2008.

[13] DIFC Securities Regulations, November 01, 2019.

[14] DIFC Investment Companies Regulations, November 12, 2018.

[15] UAE Central Bank, Banking, Link.

[16] UAE Central Bank, Banking, Link.

[17] UAE Central Bank, Banking, Link.

[18] Resolution No. 164/8/94 dated 18 April 1995.

[19] Resolution No. 58/3/96 dated 14 April 1996 and Resolution No. 165/06/2004 dated 6 December 2004.

[20] Central Bank of UAE, Anti-Money laundering legislation,  Link.

[21] DIFC Non-Financial Anti Money Laundering/Anti-Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) Regulations, Link.

[22] DMCC Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Policy and Process, Link.

[23] Mazen Boustany and Samar Safar Aly, Guidance for Financial Services Industry in the UAE, April 01, 2020, Link.

[24] The World Bank, Ease of Doing Business Rankings, Link.

[25] 2000 c 8.

[26] Bank of England, What is the Prudential Regulation Authority?, Link.

[27] Financial Conduct Authority, About the FCA, Link.

[28] 2001 No. 544.

[29] 1974 c 39.

[30] 2009 c 1.

[31] Financial Services Compensation Scheme, About us, Link.

[32] Mazen Boustany and Samar Safar Aly, Guidance for Financial Services Industry in the UAE, April 01, 2020, Link.

[33] Baker McKenzie, Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide, Link.

[34] Federal Reserve System, About the Fed, Link.

[35] Office of Comptroller of Currency, Who We Are, Link.

[36] Federal Deposit Insurance Scheme, About Us, Link.

[37] Baker McKenzie, Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide, Link

[38] 12 U.S. Code § 38.

[39] Pub. L. 63-43.

[40] 12 USC § 1751 et al.

[41] Pub. L. 81-797.

[42] 70 Stat. 133.

[43] 92 Stat. 607.

[44] 113 Stat. 1338.

[45] 124 Stat. 1376-2223.

[46] Mark Koba, Dodd-Frank Act: CNBC Explains, Link.

[47] 84 Stat. 1114-2.

[48] 115 Stat. 272.

[49] The World Bank, Ease of Doing Business Rankings, Link.

Learn more about Investment and Banking Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Corp Comm legal!

Categories
Blog

Analysis of Corporate Laws in USA, UK and UAE

By: Tanvi Rai

Introduction

“A modern economy is marked by the feasibility of endogenous change: Modernization brings myriad arrangements from expanded property rights to company law and financial institutions.”

– Edmund Phelps

Corporate law, which is also commonly known as enterprise, business, commercial or company law is a sphere of law which deals with managing and governing rights, duties, relationships and conduct of various companies, organisations, businesses and even persons. It is directly related to the life cycle of a company/corporation/business hence it involves the company’s formation, funding, governance, death and many more related aspects.

An additional aspect of Corporate Governance is represented by capital markets, culture of the business, share ownership, and many more aspects, legal rules, characteristics, problems differ from one jurisdiction to another, yet are present in across the world. Corporate law essentially regulates and controls relations amongst companies, its investors, shareholders, board of directors, employees, creditors, other stakeholders like the government, consumers, the society at large and environment along with their interaction with one another. Commercial law is umbrella term which includes company and business laws and all activities related to them. This also includes financial and corporate governance laws.

Learn more about Corporate Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants! 

Brief Historical Background of Company Law

The modern company law began in the year 1844 in England, United Kingdoms, with passing of the Joint Stock Companies Act. For the very first time a corporation/company could have been incorporated by registration. Before this act, a company could only be incorporated by obtaining either by sanction of a special Act of the Parliament of England or by obtaining a Royal Charter. There was also an important creation made in the process, which was re creation of office of the Registrar of the Joint Stock Companies. In the year 1855, the English Parliament passed another act namely the limited Liability Act which provided for the limited liability to the members of a registered company. Further, in 1856, a new and comprehensive act came into force which superseded the 1854 act and marked the starting of new company law in England creating articles and memorandum of association.

In North America, this charter and new law had two purposes, one was the colonizing rub-off, and another was a trading purpose. The Hudson’s Bay company was almost completely dedicated to only trading activities but most companies like Plymouth, London Company, Massachusetts Bay Company were wholly engaged in settlement of colonists. In other parts, the chartered English Companies continued to be formed for the expansion of new trade.

Analysis of Corporate Laws in USA, UK and UAE

Corporate Law in United States of America

The United States of America is the world’s largest economy having corporate laws at federal, state and local levels and has been flooded with business prospects. This corporate law at the federal level creates minimum requirements for business in company shares and governance rights. Being capitalistic democracy, the country and its corporate laws allow the companies to get incorporated in the state of their choice and convenience, regardless of the place of their headquarters. This and other standards have been enlisted in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and exchange Act of 1934. Over the last century, Delaware General Corporation Law is the most preferred State Law for incorporation of major Corporations and companies. This is specifically for the of lower corporate taxes, lesser shareholder rights against the board of directors of the company and that Delaware has a specialised court and legal profession. Nevada has replication the same. Out of the fifty states, twenty-four of them abide by the Model Business Corporation Act, whereas the states of New York and California are essential due to their massive size.

Incorporation, Charter Competition and Corporate Personality

The articles of incorporation are the foundation of the Company, they not just laid about the basics but also determine the state of incorporation of the company and accordingly levels of corporate taxes, various qualities of shareholder and stakeholder rights, the duties of directors and other things are determined. A business which has been rightly and legally incorporated acquires the status of a separate legal entity which is different from that of its investors. The company can both sue and be sued in its own name.

Learn more about Corporate Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants! 

Corporate Governance

In principle, a corporation’s constitution can be designed in any way so long as it complies with the compulsory rules set down by the state or federal legislature. Most state laws, and the federal government, give a broad freedom to corporations to design the relative rights of directors, shareholders, employees and other stakeholders in the articles of incorporation and the by-laws.

Duties of the Director

Decisions of a company are majorly entrusted on the directors; these can retrain as well as empower the directors in whose favour they exercise their discretion. The directors should promote shareholder value, which exercising their own business judgement to balance all the claims against various stakeholders, employees, and shareholders. Another duty of the directors are their fiduciary duties which expects them to avoid any conflict of interest between their own pursuit of profit and the interests of the corporation. Another requirement in most of the states is a basic duty of care in performance, this standard is determined from the fact that any prudent man could follow in any contract of services. But the state of Delaware has discarded these duties and allows liability waivers. Duty of care, which is primarily rested upon the shoulders of the board of directors includes standard of diligence and to act with reason and care.

Derivative Suits

The Board of Director owe their duties and responsibilities to the company as whole and not to each and every shareholder and stakeholders individually therefore the right to sue for breach of duty by the Board of directors as a whole or a single director rests by default with the company itself. Hence, this creates a problem where action is brought against a single director when the company has been taken over and the board is non- friendly or has been replaced after the company suffering bankruptcy. There are a few solutions to the aforementioned problem, first being that jurisdictions outside of US allow specific share to shareholders to claim is right. Second is by giving standing to sue to non-shareholder groups and last and the main alternative is with an independent shareholder to derive a claim on company’s behalf to sue for breach of duty. This is decided by the courts on the merits of the case.

Corporate Law in United Kingdom

The Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform which is BERR and was formerly the Department of Trade and Industry the DTI is responsible for corporate law and Governance Directorate. UK’s interest in the development of EU company law is represented by this directorate. Matters relating to various aspects of corporate governance are dealt with in codes of best practice.

Formation of the Company

An assortment of organizations might be consolidated under the Companies Act 2006. Individuals keen on beginning the undertaking – the forthcoming chiefs, representatives and investors – may pick, initially, a limitless or a restricted organization. “Limitless” will mean the incorporators will be obligated for all misfortunes and obligations under the overall standards of private law. The choice of a restricted organization prompts a subsequent option.

Rules of Attribution

While a limited organization is considered to be a legitimate individual separate from its investors and representatives, truly, an organization can just act through its workers, from the directorate down. So there should be standards to credit rights and obligations to an organization from its actors. This typically matters in light of the fact that an oppressed outsider will need to sue whoever has cash to pay for penetrate of a commitment, and organizations as opposed to their representatives frequently have more cash.

Directors’ Duties

Directors designated to the board structure the focal expert in UK organizations. In doing their capacities, directors (regardless of whether officially designated, accepted, or “shadow directors”) owe a progression of obligations to the company. There are by and by seven key obligations systematized under the Companies Act 2006 segments 171 to 177, which mirror the precedent-based law and fair standards. These may not be restricted, deferred or contracted out of, however organizations may purchase protection to take care of directors for costs in case of breach. The solutions for penetrates of obligation were not arranged, yet keep precedent-based law and value, and incorporate remuneration for misfortunes, compensation of ill-conceived gains and explicit execution or directives.

Corporate Governance

It communicated that different rules, recommendations and rules structure the rule of corporate organization inside the UK, for instance, exclusively based law rules, for instance, trustee commitments of bosses, secured reports of an association including notice and articles of alliance, form expressly Organizations Act 1985, the presenting rules applying on all associations recorded on the Point Rules or Authority Rundown, the Consolidated Code on

Corporate Administration; be that as it may, the Code’s courses of action are not central, yet it is compulsory for the recorded associations to give their yearly report a declaration showing consistence with the Code and give reasons if not concurring. Keasey, Thompson and Wright (2005) found that the Code is joined by the Smith Direction insinuating audit sheets and evaluators; the Turnbull Direction related to

Code’s internal control need and the Higgs Audit and proposed proposition of good practices. Moreover, non-authentic standards appropriated by bodies addressing institutional monetary trained professionals, for instance, ABI PIRC (the Benefits and Venture Exploration Experts and NAPF are fundamental. All the recorded associations will without a doubt adhere to these standards. Moreover, in case of public associations’ takeovers, Mergers and the rules of the Takeover close by the City Code on Takeovers are important. Additionally, Code of Market Direct of Budgetary Administrations Authority is huge as it relates to the information introduction, which is significantly sensitive and mystery and if it isn’t followed, it might incite make a sham market.

Learn more about Corporate Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants! 

Corporate Law in United Arab Emirates (UAE)

The corporate law of UAE regulates all the aspects of a company and its management right from governance to finance of the company. Each emirate has its own corporate code.

Types of Business License

There are primarily four types of business licenses provided in UAE, which are professional, commercial, industrial and tourism. Services offered by the various professionals like doctors and others, artisans and craftsmen get a professional license. Trading and commercial activities come under the ambit of commercial licenses, given that these activities are undertaking with the intensions of making profits. Industrial and manufacturing activities are carried out under the industrial license. Lastly, all activities related to tourism like hospitality and travel are covered under tourism license.

Jurisdiction of the company

There are only three jurisdictions that are followed in UAE for formation of a company, there are Mainland, Free Zone and Offshore and all company are divided into these three jurisdictions. These jurisdictions are separate licensing authorities, the mainland is licensed by Department of Economic Development of the respective emirates, which the Free Zone will be licensed by the relevant free zone authority and so will the offshore authority. In the cases of commercial as well as industrial licenses, UAE National holds/owns 51% shares and 49% is held by the expat partner. While in professional license, 100% shares are owned by expat partner but UAE national is appointed as a Local Service Agent.

Limited Liability Company (LLC)

It is the most common form of registered organisation and is recommended where the purpose of the entity is to make sales within the region. An entity with a 100% foreign ownership is not allowed in UAE.  Under the Commercial Companies Law (CCL) of the UAE the foreign investors are allowed to own 49% of equity shares in national companies and 51% at all times by one or more UAE nationals.

LLC under article 218 of CCL can be formed by minimum of 1 and maximum of 50 shareholders who are limited to the liability of their share capital in the company. In the latest amendments to article 217 of CCL minimum share capital requirement is removed allowing founders of a limited liability company the freedom to determine the company’s share capital. MoA or management contract appoints managers and a LLC must appoint one manager and maximum of five managers for business for a fixed or unlimited term. They have fill managerial and administration power, but the LLC is not allowed to practice its activities without Trade License and Commercial Registration Certificate.

Branch/Representative Office

A branch or representative office has the identical legal personality as its parent company as well as operates business under the name of its parent company. The branch or representative office carries out similar activities to that of the parent company. However they are not permitted to carry on business of importing products of the parent company, as this function can only be carried on by local trade agents. In a few instances the representative office of a foreign company are required to obtain an additional license from UAE ministry of Economy. A UAE national must be appointed as a ‘service agent’ for the branch or representative office.

Civil Company

This is a company for the professional like doctors, lawyers, engineers and accountants in UAE. Except the engineering civil company all others are a 100% owned by professional partners. However, a UAE National Local Services Agent is a mandatory. A foreign company can be a partner in a civil company, as long as the foreign company is in the same field as the civil company.

Learn more about Corporate Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants! 

Comparative Analysis and Conclusion

There is a vast and major difference among laws in US, UK and UAE. The first and the foremost difference is that of Language. While in USA and UK the entire corporate law is in English (which may differ from each other, American English in the states and British English in UK), the law and agreements are primarily in Arabic, and if written in English, have to be deciphered in Arabic. Arabic is preferred over English in UAE.

In the USA, undertakings are at various levels, i.e., government law, state law, and the close by law/local laws. Of course, in the UAE, an individual body picks the rules, and all the organizations require to expect quick to remember. In the USA, cover rules are given to be clung to and further the state applies the relatable standards close by the associations which breaker rules into their by-laws. With the ultimate objective of expense assortment, each level powers its own evaluation which the organization needs to pay. State laws are particular in every one of the 50 states. This grows the multifaceted idea of the pattern of business. The association is restricted by first the public authority rules, by then the state rules, ultimately the local standards. UAE has a uniform system. The organization close by explicit associations picks the rules for all the associations and there is no centre level. Both for the territory associations the ones in smoothed out business zones, there is only one level at which the rules are set down similarly as the obligation procedure is taken.

In UAE, the business and the piece of the business are treated as free substances and the pay made from the branch is considered as the pay of the branch itself, however, in the USA, the branch is treated as a bit of the business and not a unit of the business. Hereafter, the evaluation to be charged on that particular branch is charged on that of the whole business.

The fundamental principles of the UAE give confined commitment to the financial specialists of the association as the business and the speculators are seen as free substances. USA gives a decision to the owners of the association to either get troubled freely on the business and the speculator’s compensation comparably as UAE or the other option is get the business pay in like manner troubled as the owner’s own personal compensation. Regardless, for the resulting decision, certain conditions are to meet.

Definitively, the relationship of corporate organization practices and laws of the UK and the U.S. are similar or there is an indistinguishable standard. Regardless, for associations and their in-house managing, the changing embodiment of the definitive scene of the two countries propels various troubles. Believe it or not, after the deplorable budgetary crisis of 2008 and 2009, the laws demand totally recorded associations to hold quick to code of ethics and related laws and rules. Considering, it has been dependable with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and 2004 Act; nevertheless, for non-U.S. firms, SEC has been extraordinarily obliging giving them an open entryway through avoidances to develop their associations as they may go up against conflicting challenges considering neighbourhood laws. In the U.S., SOX expect a critical part for effective corporate organization while in the UK, Demonstration 2004, Smith Direction and various laws coordinate to clear money related itemizing.

Learn more about Corporate Laws with Enhelion’s Online Law course certified by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!