Categories
Blog

Analysis of Sexual Harassment Laws at Workplace In USA, UK And UAE

By: Aritra Sarkar 

Sexual harassment at workplace has been considered a crime by the United States labour law since the 1970s. In the USA the sexual harassment at workplace is prevented by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 1964.[1] This law protects individuals from discrimination based on sex. It makes it illegal for employers to hire, fire, alter any service conditions, etc. solely based on sex. As per U.S. law, the harasser can be of any sex and the harassment can also happen to any sex. Any general hostility towards sex is considered harassment. There are two types of sexual harassment in U.S. law.[2]

The first type is called the “quid pro quo” sexual harassment. The term “quid pro quo” literally translates to “this for that”. Therefore, this type of sexual harassment occurs when an employee is offered something in return for the satisfaction of the sexual demand of the harasser.[3] In this type of sexual harassment, an employee has to satisfy the sexual demands of the employer to affect employment decisions like hire, fire, promotions, avoid punishments, etc.[4] For being able to claim sexual harassment of the “quid pro quo” nature the employee has to be able to prove that[5]: –

Learn more about Preventing Sexual Harassment at the Workplace with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

  1. The plaintiff was an employee or has applied for employment in the company or organisation in question.
  2. The plaintiff has to prove that the defendant or the alleged harasser made unwelcome sexual advances to the plaintiff or has engaged in some kind of unwelcome verbal or physical actions of sexual nature.
  3. Certain decisions are influenced, explicitly or impliedly, by the plaintiff’s acceptance or denial of the sexual advances made by the defendant.
  4. During the time of the harassment or the conduct in question, the defendant was a supervisor or an agent of the company or organisation.
  5. The plaintiff was harmed in some form by the conduct of the alleged harasser.

The second type of sexual harassment is “hostile work environment” cases, first established by Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson[6]. In these cases, sexual harassment makes the workplace uncomfortable, offensive and intimidating. Cases where sexual favours are asked, unwelcome sexual advances are made or any other conduct of sexual nature which makes it difficult for the employee to work comfortably[7].

Courts take into considerations a variety of factors in considering whether a workplace is hostile or not, like[8]

  1. if the offensive sexual behaviour was through verbal communication or any physical conduct or both;
  2. whether the offensive sexual conduct was repeated multiple times;
  3. if the offensive sexual conduct was hostile or patently offensive;
  4. if the defendant (alleged harasser) was a co-worker or a supervisor;
  5. if other co-workers or supervisors or any staff joined in perpetrating the harassment; and
  6. if the harassment was towards a single individual or a group of persons.

Learn more about Preventing Sexual Harassment at the Workplace with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Pre-Civil rights act of 1991

Barnes v. Train[9]– This case was decided in as early as 1974. This case is considered to be the first reported case of sexual harassment at workplace in USA. In this case Barnes, an African-American woman was reportedly fired from her job at Environment Protection Agency after she had refused to submit to the sexual advances made by her employee. Although the case was dismissed, it was appealed again in 1977.

Barnes v. Costle[10]– This was the appeal of the case Barnes v. Train. Although Paulette Barnes, the plaintiff, lost in Barnes v. Train, she won the case on appeal. During this case, the district of Colombia court of appeals rules that if a person suffers tangible employment losses for not submitting to the unwelcomed sexual advances by his/her employer or supervisor then it will be considered as sexual harassment. The decision was partly influenced by the case of Williams v. Saxbe[11] which was decided a year before in 1976. The court also ruled that the company will be liable in case it is not knowingly taking proper action against sexual harassments done by supervisors.

Post-Civil rights act of 1991

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White[12]– In this case, the court broadened the view of sexual harassment conducts to include any altercation in-service conditions or any other decisions that will dissuade an employee to file a suit for discrimination.

Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.[13]– This case was decided as recently as 2010. In this case, it was held that a hostile work environment is created if sexually explicit language or pornography is present. Hostile workplace environment does not have to be targeted towards an individual employee; it might as well be targeted to a group of employees.

UK

In UK, all employees are protected from sexual harassment at workplace by the Equality Act, 2010. The legal definition sexual harassment according to the equality act is- “The Equality Act says it’s harassment where the behaviour is meant to or has the effect of either: violating your dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.”[14] Besides this general prohibition of sexual harassment section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 specifically provides for 3 different types of sexual harassment: –

  1. Relevant Protected Characteristics– Section 26(1) states that ‘A’ will harass ‘B’ if (a) “A engages in unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic” (b) for the purpose or effect of (i) “violating B’s dignity”, or (ii) “creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for B.”[15]
  2. Unwanted Conduct of a Sexual Nature- Section 26(2) states that ‘A’ will harass ‘B’ if (a) “A engages in unwanted conduct of a sexual nature” and (b) “the conduct has the purpose or effect referred to in subsection (1)(b).”[16]
  3. Differential treatment- Section 26(3) states that ‘A’ will harass ‘B’ if (a) “A or another person engages in unwanted conduct of a sexual nature or that is related to gender reassignment or sex”, (b) “the conduct has the purpose or effect referred to in subsection (1)(b)” and (c) “because of B’s rejection of or submission to the conduct, A treats B less favourably than A would treat B if B had not rejected or submitted to the conduct.”[17]

Learn more about Preventing Sexual Harassment at the Workplace with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

Section 26(5) of the Act states lists the relevant protected characteristics, namely, age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation.[18]

In 2019 there was a consultation on the context of sexual harassment at workplace and it was decided that the policies regarding workplace harassment should be tightened up. Consequently, the UK equality body and the Equality and Human Rights Commission together published “technical guidance” in January 2020, in consideration that it would become a statutory code of practice once the response to the 2019 consultation is published by the government.[19]

However, there is no specific set of rules which regulates the responsibility on the employers to take pro-active actions in private sector industries, the employers are still expected to take adequate measures to prevent sexual harassment at workplace to avoid being liable for any such misconduct through the principle of vicarious liability. The situation is stricter in public sectors because the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) explicitly says that the employers should give due regard to prevent any incidents of sexual harassment at workplace.[20]

UAE

UAE law like most other countries strictly prohibits any kind of sexual harassment at workplace. Sexual harassment in the form of repeated offensive jokes, offensive or sexual comments, unwelcomed touch etc. is prohibited. Any offensive or unwelcoming sexual behaviour if experienced by any woman can be reported to the police or to a lawyer for taking proper actions against it.[21]

Chapter 5 of the federal law no. 3 of 1987 of UAE penal code deals with the crimes that are perpetrated against women. Section 1 deals with Rape and debasement, section 2 deals with Flagrant Indecent Acts and section 3 deals with the enticement to lewdness and prostitution. Sexual harassment in the workplace is covered under section 2 of Chapter 5 of the federal law no. 3 of 1987 of UAE penal code. This section has two articles article 358 and 359.[22]

Article 358 states that “Any person who publicly commits a disgraceful act shall be punished by a jail sentence for no less than six months. The same penalty shall apply to any person who says or commits any act against public morals. Any person, who commits an indecent act with a woman or a boy under the age of fifteen years even if not in public, shall be punished by a jail sentence for no less than one year.”[23]

Here we can see that article 358 of the UAE penal code explicitly protects both women and men below the age of 15 years. The rest of the section does not talk about whether it will be protecting both women and men rather it says to protect against “disgraceful acts” and “against public morals”. However, in my opinion, courts should take a broad view of the above article.

Article 359 states that “Shall be subject to a jail sentence for a term not exceeding one year and/or to a fine not in excess of ten thousand Dirhams, whoever molests a female in an indecent way by words or acts or through electronic means or any other method. Shall be sentenced as well to the same penalty, any male disguised in a female apparel and enters in this disguise a place reserved for women or where entry is forbidden for other than women. Should he perpetrate a crime in this condition, this shall be considered an aggravating circumstance.”[24]

Learn more about Preventing Sexual Harassment at the Workplace with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!

A new article was added under no. 359 bis by virtue of Article 2 of the Federal Decree-Law no. 4/2019 dated 14/08/2019. Article 359 bis states that the perpetrator “Shall be subject to a jail sentence for a term not less than one year and/or to a fine not less than ten thousand Dirhams, whoever commits a sexual harassment crime. Sexual harassment shall mean excessive annoyance of others by repeating acts, words or signals that would molest them, for the purpose of pushing them to respond to their own sexual desires or the desires of others. The penalty shall be a jail sentence for a term not less than two years and/or a fine not less than fifty thousand Dirhams, in case of several perpetrators, in case the perpetrator carries a weapon, or the perpetrator has a functional, family or educational authority over the victim.”[25]

As we can see section 359 bis clearly defines harassment in general and states the punishment for such an act. Furthermore, articles 360 to 370 punishes sexual offences in public but none of the articles however mentions “workplace” explicitly. Nonetheless, because of their general nature, these articles combined can be very helpful in preventing sexual harassment at the workplace.

In conclusion, I would like to say that even though all the three countries discussed in this write-up are having a different set of laws, sexual harassment at workplace is mostly developed in the legal system of USA and UK mainly because of the sheer number of cases there. In UAE most of the articles are general in nature, although they will prevent sexual harassment in the workplace but a separate law explicitly regarding harassment at workplace is essential to take care of matters related to the hostility of the employer towards the employee after he/she reports a sexual harassment case etc.

[1]Staff, “Facts About Sexual Harassment” (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 15 January 1997) <https://www.eeoc.gov/publications/facts-about-sexual-harassment> accessed 17 December 2020

[2]Staff, “Workplace Fairness” (Sexual Harassment – Legal Standards, 2020) <https://www.workplacefairness.org/sexual-harassment-legal-rights> accessed 17 December 2020

[3] Findlaw’s Team, “What Is Quid Pro Quo Harassment?” (Findlaw, 4 December 2018) <https://employment.findlaw.com/employment-discrimination/what-is-quid-pro-quo-harassment.html> accessed 17 December 2020

[4]Staff, “Workplace Fairness” (Sexual Harassment – Legal Standards, 2020) <https://www.workplacefairness.org/sexual-harassment-legal-rights> accessed 17 December 2020

[5] Staff, “What Is Quid Pro Quo Harassment: Discrimination Attorneys” (Swartz, 2 July 2019) <https://swartz-legal.com/employment-law-resources/quid-pro-quo-harassment/> accessed 17 December 2020

 

[6] Mcelroy W, “The Sad Evolution of Sexual Harassment” <http://www.wendymcelroy.com/ifeminists/2004/1027.html> accessed 17 December 2020

[7] Staff, “Workplace Fairness” (Sexual Harassment – Legal Standards, 2020)   <https://www.workplacefairness.org/sexual-harassment-legal-rights> accessed 17 December 2020

[8] Ibid

[9] Barnes v. Train, 13 FEP Cases 123 (D.D.C. 1974)

[10] Barnes v. Costle, 561 F.2d 983 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

[11] Williams v. Saxbe, 413 F. Supp. 654 (1976)

[12] Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 126 S. Ct. 2405 (2006)

[13] Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 594 F.3d 798 (11th Cir. 2010)

[14] Staff, “Harassment” (Citizens Advice, 2020) <https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/what-are-the-different-types-of-discrimination/harassment/> accessed 17 December 2020

[15] Equality Act 2010, s 26(1) (UK)

[16] Equality Act 2010, s 26(2) (UK)

[17] Equality Act 2010, s 26(3) (UK)

[18] Equality Act 2010, s 26(5) (UK)

[19] Staff, “Sexual Harassment in the Workplace in the United Kingdom” (CMS Law/Tax 27 October 2020) <https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-on-sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace/united-kingdom> accessed 17 December 2020

[20] Ibid

[21] Elhais H, “What Are Your Legal Rights Under Sexual Harassment? – Criminal Law – United Arab Emirates” (Mondaq, 6 September 2019) <https://www.mondaq.com/crime/843168/what-are-your-legal-rights-under-sexual-harassment> accessed 17 December 2020

[22] Federal Law No. 3 1987

[23] Federal Law No. 3 1987, art 358

[24] Federal Law No. 3 1987, art 359

[25] Ibid

 

Learn more about Preventing Sexual Harassment at the Workplace with Enhelion’s Online Law firm certified course by Scriboard Advocates and Legal Consultants!